Customize

IF we have people in Co$, it is safe to assume...

Discussion in 'Think Tank' started by Anarchy, Nov 27, 2010.

  1. Anarchy Member

    IF we have people in Co$, it is safe to assume...

    They have people inside us. I believe many members of the Co$ have thought of this, but maybe they are very secretive, if this is the case, how will we root them of out anon?
  2. Random guy Member

    Re: IF we have people in Co$, it is safe to assume...

    We won't. We'll troll them for our own amusement until they quit, us or the cult. Either is a win.
  3. anonakatie Member

    Re: IF we have people in Co$, it is safe to assume...

    It doesn't really matter. They tend to reveal themselves, and there isn't anything secret here for them to find out.
  4. Anonymous Member

    Re: IF we have people in Co$, it is safe to assume...

    It is widely accepted that OSA goons watches this site.
  5. Anonymous Member

    Re: IF we have people in Co$, it is safe to assume...

    2545911313_0c0584068d.jpg
  6. an0nim0uz Member

    Re: IF we have people in Co$, it is safe to assume...

    Of course there are OSA spahs here. But they usually are so fucking obvious that it's actually pretty funny.

    disguise_fail.jpg

    Also, as some dude already pointed out, there's not really super sekrit stuff to find on here anyways.
  7. LocalSP Member

    Re: IF we have people in Co$, it is safe to assume...

    I thought everyone knew that all the Mods here are OSA. ;-)
  8. an0nim0uz Member

    Re: IF we have people in Co$, it is safe to assume...

    I thought only Rufus is OSA.

    Oh, the humanity.
  9. LocalSP Member

    Re: IF we have people in Co$, it is safe to assume...

    Rufus is Nazi OSA. There is a difference.
  10. Re: IF we have people in Co$, it is safe to assume...

    Oh, good. I thought my pants were tight because of all the holiday feasting. It's just someone inside of me. That explains it. So I won't have to go on a "beans and rice" diet to lose weight around the beginning of the new year.
  11. Random guy Member

    Re: IF we have people in Co$, it is safe to assume...

    It's just excess body thetans, the swarm at this time of year.
  12. ZeroC Member

    Re: IF we have people in Co$, it is safe to assume...

    I'm OSA
  13. willhaven720 Member

    Re: IF we have people in Co$, it is safe to assume...

    I <3 mie OSA'z

    =)
  14. anonakatie Member

    Re: IF we have people in Co$, it is safe to assume...

    I'm the love child of a gay tryst between Toni Chrambanis("B face") and jennifer McDonald Cox.
  15. Anonymous Member

    Re: IF we have people in Co$, it is safe to assume...

    I certainly hope OSA is watching us laughing at them, it'd be disappointing if they weren't.
  16. Anonymous Member

    Re: IF we have people in Co$, it is safe to assume...

    They've been here with us since 2008, both OL and IRL. This is why I always get so pissed with the claims of moonbattery, because it's both common sense and common knowledge that their SOP is to infiltrate groups that oppose them (CAN, anyone?) I have seen obvious scifags at protests who claimed to be "someone's father" (that happened in London, guy with a camera, trimmed goatee/mustache light brown short hair probably in his 40's) or something but they were really obvious. When shit started to hit the fan February and March 2008 and they started targetting Cali Anonymous, they dox'd Gareth and had two people in masks (one EFG, one Jason style mask) with signs showing his dox and pic and arrows pointing to him. They have been on our forums for awhile, and have been attempting to gain mod status (which I suspect they've succeeded in doing here). What was hilarious was watching scifags "infiltrate" /b/, oh god that was one of the funniest fucking things I'd ever seen. This is why the *chans were most successful, btw, and the same dynamic holds true today. Go to /new/ and watch people bashing Israel, and it's "JIDF detected" "NO U stormfaggot". The dynamic is different on forums. They're only successful against wogs/NORPs but tend to fail utterly against Anonymous of the *chans. This, I think, is due to the natural state of perpetual trolling and conflict the *chans engender, as opposed to forums like this where sometimes I'm just waiting for idiots to be all "ASL? let's hookup". There was another girl in Washington DC I saw in a pic holding a sign that said "4CHAN.ORG" who was clearly not one of us. I've seen multiple instances of shit like that happening, and no one seemed to care. Other times, they just pretend to be a homeless guy or random person on the street while filming us, or trying to film from the bushes (think "KGB? lol no")

    tl;dr spais from both sides have been mingling with each other practically since day one
  17. Anonymous Member

    Re: IF we have people in Co$, it is safe to assume...

    Here YouTube - Gareth Cales: Victim of Scientology Fair Game - Aspect Ratio Fix They dox'd ath and Rorschach, among others, and posted their faces in YT videos with the typical "Anonymous terrorist exposed!" bullshit, along with their names, address, face etc. Yes, they were lurking IRC even then. And they also have people inside a London police wing, or at least the MTA (?) was caught accepting kickbacks from them. That was when they had a 14 year old arrested for calling them a "cult" which made headlines. OP, I'm assuming you're a newfag. There's a reason for the masks and anonymity. We're both inside each other. It's pretty hot, bro.
  18. Anonymous Member

    Re: IF we have people in Co$, it is safe to assume...

    Most of OSA is Nazi OSA, and the SeaOrg to a degree. Total fetish for them. Especially vaLLarrr, I think she's got a Nazi bondage fetish.
  19. vaLLarrr Member

    Re: IF we have people in Co$, it is safe to assume...

    Actually I'm more into Stalin era vodka fuelled orgies...
  20. anonakatie Member

    Re: IF we have people in Co$, it is safe to assume...

    We have had spais in real life in NYC-"Addictive Chestnut" springs readily to mind.
    They have been there since the beginning. They are there now and still.

    This actually rather than something to fear gives us great amusement.
    There is nothing to spai on. So if in NY, home of the most insane cell, we don't care, why should anyone else?
  21. LarryBren Member

    Re: IF we have people in Co$, it is safe to assume...

    We are indeed watching and waiting. Be very afraid!!!:

    OSAGoon3.jpg
  22. anonsoldier Member

    Re: IF we have people in Co$, it is safe to assume...

    Man, I hope I'm not OSA. That would really suck to find out.
  23. Anonymous Member

    Re: IF we have people in Co$, it is safe to assume...

    6a00d83451f25369e20120a679ac14970c-800wi.jpg
  24. Anonymous Member

    Re: IF we have people in Co$, it is safe to assume...

    You guys do own pretty fucking hard. You, and SoCal, and some britfags. This thread is now a nostalgia thread for those who might have missed it:
    YouTube - Boogaloo Xenu vs Scientology
    YouTube - /b/ritfags confirmed for brawl
    YouTube - Montage: 2/10/08, Anon vs. Scientology
    YouTube - DJ AnounymOS - I'M TAKIN' U SRS (feat Paul Fetch) v1.1
    YouTube - Anonymous calls Scientology to ask some questions
  25. Anonymous Member

    Re: IF we have people in Co$, it is safe to assume...

    Any $cilons on this board?

    Zerro
  26. Smurf Member

    Re: IF we have people in Co$, it is safe to assume...

    Srsly. Your baby pictures make sense now... &lt;3

    ugly_baby.jpg
  27. xenubarb Member

    Re: IF we have people in Co$, it is safe to assume...

    San Diego had a fail spai once. He was so over the top, his fail shown so hard a blind man could've felt it.
  28. anonsoldier Member

    Re: IF we have people in Co$, it is safe to assume...

    When did we have a spai? This had to be since I left.
  29. anonakatie Member

    Re: IF we have people in Co$, it is safe to assume...

    Hey Smurf, where u get ma baby pics? Dang, you are good!

    ETA: this comment is the sixth result when you google Toni Chrambanis, lol.
  30. Anonymous Member

    Re: IF we have people in Co$, it is safe to assume...

    Sup Oswald. You are right. I am OSA. And I'm a winner- how does that make you feel?
  31. SOJOA Member

    Re: IF we have people in Co$, it is safe to assume...

    .....wouldnt surprise me.......much love rufus....phhfftt HAHAHAHAAHAHA
  32. SOJOA Member

    Re: IF we have people in Co$, it is safe to assume...

    i truely pity the man whose face that is.....honest.
  33. JohnnyRUClear Member

    Re: IF we have people in Co$, it is safe to assume...

    Dude, no. Rowan Atkinson FTW.
  34. Anonymous Member

    Re: IF we have people in Co$, it is safe to assume...

    The Church of Scientology told me I had aliens inside me, too.

    shrug.gif
  35. UMULAS Member

    Re: IF we have people in Co$, it is safe to assume...

    Sadly to say that the church really isn't aware at us knowing the fact that majority of people belive that project chanology is dead.
  36. Smurf Member

    Re: IF we have people in Co$, it is safe to assume...

    I assure you. There is no one inside me except a bored thetan that's always hungry.
  37. Anonymous Member

    Re: IF we have people in Co$, it is safe to assume...

    ^^ Use Your Raid to destroy those sneaky OSA bugs & cockroaches. Maybe need to Raid more.

    [IMG]

Share This Page

Customize Theme Colors

Close

Choose a color via Color picker or click the predefined style names!

Primary Color :

Secondary Color :
Predefined Skins