https://standardtech.wordpress.com/...mber-admits-to-committing-a-crime-against-me/ TL;TR leave cellphone at reception desk. receive explicit text from romantic partner. receptionist intrigued by message. searches phone for more. receptionist finds more. receptionist reports you for 'sexually perverted conduct'. scientology, [insert ironic tagline here]
What happened to you and your girlfriend is outrageous., Could you shed some light for me on why intimate texts between consenting adults were considered wrong ?
You'd have to ask blog owner. I just find it hilarious that a "most ethical receptionist on the planet" feels the need to snoop into someone else's phone.
brownie points they turn each other in for eveything and are of course encoraged to do so. Part of the mind fuck of being in a cult and keeping it working. This would make the stool pidgeon upstat = win!
Return the favor by suing the individual and the Scientology corporation for breaching your right to privacy. The receptionist had no right to examine the private contents of your phone, or report those contents to the Scientology corporation.
Lol, you have no idea how much I turned myself inside out editing, and re-editing my question so as to not offend 'another 123, the indie who wants back in' I really must attempt to get more sleep.
... makes me wonder if the C/S was having an exceptionally unmerry christmas and needed cheering up with some porn...
. OMG! The fact that this happened not once, but twice..... and recently......sends a chill down my back. I hope this information ( regarding how invasive the cult is) gets distributed far and wide. Perhaps it will be the final death rattle of this insidious cult. I was curious who this obnoxious, snooping, dried-up old prune, Wendy Hiler was: Whoa........no wonder she was gawking at his junk......she probably hasn't seen any for decades!
. Probably everyone of those ol' ladies (including DM) wanted to stare at that evidence......after all.....junk is junk. You take what you can get at that age! .
I don't understand why Scientology is so obsessed with other people's sex lives. I remember a story that somebody on the Freewinds was assigned the condition of treason, because her husband was masturbating, and it was blamed on her for allegedly not satisfying him. Apparently, masturbation is also a no no.
Scientologists don't have sex, not like normal people, all the emotions are stripped out in accordance with that fat ugly fuck LRH.
this is not actually what you asked for, but your /r/ reminded me of this thread: https://whyweprotest.net/community/threads/scientology-porn.24124/ also this one: https://whyweprotest.net/community/threads/scientology-pron-exists-proof-here.46535/
Sex is normal. Gazing at the naked body parts of your lover is normal. Sharing sweet nothings or lascivious nothings with your lover is normal. Make those sinful and most of the parishioners are now GUILTY GUILTY GUILTY and in dire need of church services to 1) save your soul or 2) save the planet.
Almost but not quite. While masturbation is openly accepted and celebrated, it is not enforced with punishments for those who do not wish to participate. There are no interrogations to determine whether Anonymous has masturbated in the correct manner and with the correct frequency.
Now you tell me. Just to check I've not been out-tech: what is the correct manner and the correct frequency?
But wait, there's more. The way it works if you are fucking consciously following his system, the sexual energy released stays trapped in this space to keep his egregore present and alive- so in a weird sense he is in the room watching you. At least the OTO and Pascal Beverly Randolph (http://archive.org/details/SexualMagic) let you get down. And do it for yourself and not KSW.
