This is what I love about anti science types. You don't have to know anything at all yet you call people vile names based on your own ignorance. I linked a talk with an actual climate scientist, and yet, because TI saw the term denier associated with her TI refused to consider her at all. Let me show you what he was refusing to consider: I actually learned more about climate science in her hour interview that I have from reading newspaper articles. So, what TI is saying is that his ignorance of a complex and difficult topic is more important than this woman's years of dedicating her life to a search for truth. She has published 130 papers in the field. TI is saying that because someone else labeled someone 'denier' that he has no obligation to learn what she actually says. TI, you reject information based on your assessment of its ideological purity. If it is somehow 'right wing' in your mind, then you reject it out of hand, Oh well, carry on.