CO: GORMAN Is it true that on the 12th of July, during an otherwise peaceful protest you approached part of Anonymous within what is considered by common law to be a personal saftey zone, physically threatened him with violence both at the time of the confrontation and in the future at his private place of residence? Is it true that in six months of peaceful operations this constitutes the first time threats of violence have been made by someone other than scientologists? Is it true that these threats of physical violence and psychological intimidation of expressing intimate knowledge of the Anon's place of residence were used to coerce him to comply with your wishes to resolve a civil matter? Is it true that this practice is commonly referred to as 'Fair Game' by Scientologists, Anonymous and the media? Is it true that had the situation escalated per your threats of physical violence into an assault local authorities who were either A.) most likely already present or B.) dispatched to respond by the Scientologist presence at the event would have intervened?. Is it true that this fiasco would have been newsworthy and spread like wildfire through the galaxy of newsoutlets who have us and our actions on their radar? Is it true that CoS is designed to capitalize off flaps precisely like this? Is it true that has this had happened, had this anon not have stepped down, had the situation escalated into a fist fight between you and Anonymous in front of the Lincoln Memorial Anonymous would most likely be suffering more bad press than any DDOS, any racial slur through a megaphone or in fact, any thing any one in Anonymous or Scientology has ever done, ever in the history of the movement? Anonymous, you tell me. EDIT: This post is composed of nothing but questions. I want answers to these questions. Please consider that before posting. And Gorman: when/if you respond please respond to my questions. I don't care about anything but the facts. Start another thread if you want to lecture.