David Love Files Lawsuits against Narconon Scientology

I recall there is an HCOPL which instructs morg staff to refuse registered or certified mail. So, Hubbard would rather have a Bailiff shove the docs up a staff member's ass.
Fine with me.

I hereby crown Intelligence King Dox.

Now that I have an unofficial translation from French to English, I'll post this. There's nothing
confidential or such:

This ^^^ Show me the Case Precedent, Jean? Never mind, I'll show you the Court Precedent in due course.

What Legal Fees? Did we have to hire a Lawyer to figure this mess out for you?

He MAY be right on documents that pertain to Private Investigations that the COS/OSA started or continued on with AFTER I filed the Lawsuit, but not prior to - or especially my NN TR Case Files as a Student/Staff - AND any information gathered prior to the dated Court Stamp, filing the Lawsuit. In my opinion, of course ... and with a little help from ...

ACCESS to INFORMATION:

Held in Public Body:

http://www.cai.gouv.qc.ca/documents/CAI_FO_acces_doc_org_pub_eng.pdf

Held in Private Enterprise:

http://www.cai.gouv.qc.ca/documents/CAI_FO_acces_rens_ent_priv_eng.pdf

Examination of Disagreement:

http://www.cai.gouv.qc.ca/documents/CAI_FO_exam_mesentente_ent_priv_eng.pdf

AN ACT RESPECTING ACCESS TO DOCUMENTS HELD BY PUBLIC BODIES AND THE PROTECTION OF PERSONAL INFORMATION:

http://www2.publicationsduquebec.go...ge.php?type=2&file=/A_2_1/A2_1_A.html

AN ACT RESPECTING THE PROTECTION OF PERSONAL INFORMATION IN THE PRIVATE SECTOR:

http://www2.publicationsduquebec.go....php?type=2&file=/P_39_1/P39_1_A.html

USING MY INFORMATION TO PROMOTE NARCONON is ACTIONABLE:

http://www.thecourt.ca/2015/04/02/l...edom-of-religion-for-religious-organizations/

Scientology in Montreal is NOT registered as a Religious Charity, but does have some religious rights such as marriage:

http://thephilanthropist.ca/2004/12...-profit-organizations-a-national-perspective/

BUT if it was recognized as a non-profit Religious Organization:

Under Canada’s FEDERAL Personal Information Protection and Electronics Documents Act] (PIPEDA):

• if an organization wants to collect, use or disclose personal information about people, it needs consent, except in a few specific and limited circumstances;
• an organization can use or disclose a person’s personal information only for the purpose for which that person gave consent;
• even with consent, an organization has to limit the collection, use, and disclosure to purposes that a reasonable person would consider appropriate under the circumstances;

• individuals have a right to see the personal information that the organization holds about them, and to correct any inaccuracies; andthere is oversight of the legislation through the Privacy Commissioner of Canada to ensure that the law is respected and redress is received if a person’s rights are violated.



***********************************************************
https://www.priv.gc.ca/information/pub/dec_050816_e.pdf

http://thephilanthropist.ca/2004/12...-profit-organizations-a-national-perspective/

The Protection of Personal Information by Charities and Not-For-Profit Organizations: A National Perspective

• Issue 4, Volume 19
• PDF
• Tags: Alberta, British Columbia,Business, Canada, Data,Fundraising, Individuals, Law,Legislation, Pipeda
• Disclaimer: This article was converted into HTML from thisPDF, which forms the original and authoritative version.
• Google Translate

This article is adapted and updated from a presentation at the 2nd National Symposium on Charity Law in Toronto in April 2004. Parts of this article are modified from Jones, P. “Between God and You: Canada’s New Privacy Law,” published in The Philanthropist, Vol. 18, No. 1 (2003), with permission, and from a 2003 presentation by Paul Jones and Jasmine Sweatman.
Introduction
Under Canada’s Personal Information Protection and Electronics Documents Act (PIPEDA):
• if an organization wants to collect, use or disclose personal information about people, it needs consent, except in a few specific and limited circumstances;
• an organization can use or disclose a person’s personal information only for the purpose for which that person gave consent;
• even with consent, an organization has to limit the collection, use, and disclosure to purposes that a reasonable person would consider appropriate under the circumstances;
• individuals have a right to see the personal information that the organization holds about them, and to correct any inaccuracies; and
• there is oversight of the legislation through the Privacy Commissioner of Canada to ensure that the law is respected and redress is received if a person’s rights are violated.

fuckers
So if i understand this, they are saying you can't have the documents because the law doesn't apply to them because they are "church" . *cough*
then they quote the law "article 39 of the law "
So which is it? They say the law doesn't apply then they quote the law?
holy Xenu I hate them

This is NOT a big deal whatsoever... just a stall/resistance tactic that I've experienced all too often and expected. My suggestion, is they retain good legal advice because I will RAIN HELL DOWN on them with more submissions and MOTIONS until all options are exhausted.

Narconon Trois-Riviers can NOT claim Religious nonsense, and in my opinion, neither can the COS Montreal?

There is THREE Plaintiffs: Narconon Trois-Rivieres, Church of Scientology Montreal, and the Executive
of Narconon Trois-Rivieres, Therese S. Even if NN TR files for Bankrupcy, I have filed against a NN Director under the Civil Code/Act of Quebec in reference to LIFTING the CORPORATE VEIL:

https://www.ic.gc.ca/eic/site/cilp-pdci.nsf/eng/cl00693.html

Liability in Tort
A tort is a civil wrong recognized by courts even though it may not be contemplated under statute, and for which the injured party may seek damages. Directors are not personally liable for torts committed in a corporate context unless their conduct itself is tortious. Footnote 2
Although there is limited case law on the issue, particularly in the context of not-for-profit corporations, one possible instance of directors' con-duct constituting a tort is the case of negligent mismanagement. Negligent mismanagement arises when the injury suffered by the tort victim can be attributed to carelessness in the oversight of some aspect of the corporation's operations. It relates to situations where the board knew of, or ought to have foreseen, a systemic problem and failed to address it.
Example
Where the directors permitted an unsafe condition to exist on the corporation's property and that unsafe condition lead to a personal injury this could constitute negligent mismangement on the part of the directors and result in personal liability.

The Lawsuit against NN TR has basically already been investigated and decided by the Quebec Human Rights Commission. If NN TR is the ONLY Plaintiff found guilty, I may have to file a Lawsuit in Quebec Superior Court against Scientology Montreal et al.

Here's my take on WHY Jean accepted the $15.00 Registered letter? I think it was out of curiousity,
and/or OSA said it was ok to do so?

The next documents he will receive will NOT be by Registered Mail.




Scientology Toronto - Yvette Shank REFUSED to accept and the Dox were returned to me.

Narconon Trois-Rivieres would be stupid NOT to accept the Registered Mail dox. The Judge
would frown on their actions/behaviour.

Now, I will address the Montreal Court for COSTS above what the Lawsuit is for... and these
COSTS are running up quite the Tab for the Plaintiffs.

.

yikes what a bunch of sniveling losers

Yes indeed, 'they' snivel and cry at a lame/fail Tone 40 attempt - LOL.

This Lawsuit is interesting because the Plaintiff/Defendants are NOt allowed to have a Lawyer present in the Court Room. We must represent ourselves, and submit to being questioned and cross-examined under oath.

One mainstream Reporter has contacted me and I should know soon if Media is allowed in the Court Room?

The ONLY reason I haven't posted more documents on WWP or elsewhere, is to save for cross-examination of the Defendants. Tipping my hand now would only benefit the Defendants... and allow them to prepare for questions and answers.

Cheers.

Just waiting for more information from Montreal before a News Story is up.

Does anyone know what Jean Lariviere's designation of 'Director of Public Affairs' is???

I know he's the head honch at the COS Montreal, but is this ^^^ OSA or OSA related? Would he
be Sea Org?

Just off phone with Montreal Courthouse. The Lawsuit is moving forward and waiting for Court Clerk
to set a Trial Date. Have up to fifteen days prior to Trial to submit additional evidence documents
to Court.

http://www.justice.gouv.qc.ca/english/ministere/acces/acces-a.htm

Lariviere is head osabot in Montreal and he is not necessarily a sea ogre.

Montreal Lawyer - Legal Advice: (Lawyer recently obtained a doctorate degree in law (field of privacy law) from Université de Panthéon-Assas (Paris II) and University of Montreal)

1 - Scientology Montreal is a 'religious organization' registered as a Corporation in Quebec. It is not a registered religious organization with Revenue Canada and does not have Federal Charitable tax status. A recent Supreme Court Ruling:

http://business.financialpost.com/legal-post/scientology-donors-cant-claim-tax-credits

Jean Lariviere is correct that my request was made under the 'Public Sector' and should have been under the 'Private Sector' as COS Montreal is not governed under 'Public' - rather 'Private'.

COS Montreal is a non-profit legal person, also called a "non-profit organization (NPO)," is a group of individuals who do not intend to make pecuniary gains to distribute among the members of the group.

A non-profit legal person engages in non-profit activities that are altruistic, moral, cultural, social, philanthropic, national, patriotic, religious, charitable, scientific, artistic, professional, athletic, sporting, educational or other in nature.

http://www2.publicationsduquebec.go...lecharge.php?type=2&file=/P_39_1/P39_1_A.html

Private sector organizations have to comply with the Quebec Act Respecting the Protection of Personal Information in the Private Sector, (the “Privacy Act”) which has been in effect since 1993:

CIVIL CODE:

Privacy in Quebec is also governed by the Civil Code of Quebec (“C.C.Q”), at articles 3, and 35 to 41 inclusively. More specifically, article 35 states a general principle under which every person has a right to the respect of his reputation and privacy, and that no one may invade the privacy of a person without the consent of such person unless authorized by law. Article 36 details the type of activities which may be considered as an invasion of privacy of a person:

http://www2.publicationsduquebec.gouv.qc.ca/dynamicSearch/telecharge.php?type=2&file=/CCQ_1991/CCQ1991_A.html

The Privacy Act applies to a person which collects, holds, uses or communicates personal information to third persons in the course of carrying on an enterprise. The terms “carrying on an enterprise” is defined as follows: “carrying on by one or more persons of an organized economic activity, whether or not it is commercial in nature, consisting of producing, administering or alienating property, or providing a service, constitutes the carrying on of an enterprise”

Here's the Kicker under the Federal PIPEDA:

Yes, the Privacy Act is substantially similar to PIPEDA and is based on the same principles as are found in PIPEDA. Similar to PIPEDA, the Privacy Act provides a general privacy framework under which an organization that collects personal information from an individual must inform him/her of the use which will be made of the information, of the categories of persons who will have access to it within the enterprise, of the place where the file will be kept and of the rights of access and rectification. These individuals must provide their consent to the collection, communication or use of their personal information and such consent must be manifest, free, and enlightened, must be given for specific purposes and will only be valid for the length of time needed to achieve the purposes for which it was requested. This being said, the Privacy Act is not an ombudsman model such as PIPEDA. Under the Privacy Act, two types of penalties may apply for non-compliance:

Fines: Every organization who collects, holds, communicates to third persons or uses personal information on other persons otherwise than in accordance with the provisions of the Privacy Act is liable to a fine of $1,000 to $10,000 and, for a subsequent offence, to a fine of $10,000 to $20,000. For a contravention of section 17 (Cross-border transfer to OSA or USA ORG), the fine is $5,000 to $50,000 and, for a subsequent offence, $10,000 to $100,000.

Following my conversation with the Montreal Court Clerk this morning, I was asked to call back this Thursday/Friday at which time I will be asking the court for a decision, and file a 'MOTION' to compel.

However, the COS Montreal has nothing to do with the business of NN TR, right? According to the Quebec Human Rights Commission invesitigator they do. And one of many leaked emails confirm.

I have the Names of the Volunteer Ministers sent by the COS Montreal:

Leaked Email EXCERPT - Date: 19 Feb 2003

These Emails were sent out for:

Narconon of Southern California (located in Orange County)
Narconon Montreal (Canada)
Narconon Europe Continental Office (Denmark)
Narconon CIS National Office (Russia)
Narconon Dimitrovgrad (Russia)
Narconon Gabbiano (Italy)

Narconon Mediterraneo (Spain)

SCIENTOLOGY Operating NarcaCON - Leaked Email:

Sorry for the long post... me does get long-winded at times. 'Welcome to Court in Montreal, COS Montreal
and Narconon Trois-Rivieres' -- much more to be revealed in front of a Judge.

The scientology crime syndicate is predictably using the religious cloaking tactic again, which they fixedly believe they can get away with in Canada. Hey osa, just because your con usually works south of the border does not mean it works here.

Amen.. I agree 100% and will heed 'some' of the advice that obviously came from his Lawyer:

So, now I request the same documents/files under the Private Sector as noted.

Will seek legal and advise and contact the again Court this week.

Nice chat with two Court Clerks today and have to call again next week a few minutes after
dox are Faxed.

COS/NN want a Court Trial, let's do eet.

Should be interesting indeed with Jean Latrine Larivière now threatening my Quebec Civil rights to
request documents/files and their lengthy history of Crimes in Canada, including NN TR's human
rights abuses connected to Montreal COS.

http://www.solitarytrees.net/racism/canada.htm

Scientology guilty of 'Breach of Public Trust' crimes is beginning to ring bright and clear with
the Montreal Courthouse..,. Next week will be loud and clear with evidence document dump
into the Court Clerk lawsuit file. Hello media.

With organized scientology, the "we don't do that anymore", "Fair Game was cancelled" , "it was a rogue unit that has been disbanded" explanations are always lies.
Their crimes continue because the subject is based on lies and fraud.
With organized scientology, it is always the same shit, just another day.

With the forwarded email I have recently, Fair Game and Dead Agenting is alive and well. These emails
will be sent to the Court Clerk as Exibits.

Establishing that NN TR is guilty of Breach of Contact is easy as it appeared to the Court Clerks
when they read the Resolution Decision from the Quebec Human Rights Commission.

Establishing that the COS Montreal/OSA/Yvette Shank was in control over the Administration
and Directives of NN TR is easy to do... especially with the emails I have and Shank being on
the premises at NN TR.

The COS Montreal sending Volunteer Ministers to NN TR is well established in emails, and the
COS Montreal Director of Public Affairs administering directives to the ED at NN TR is a smoking gun.

This is not a criminal case that must be decided on 'Proof Beyond a Reasonable Doubt' --- it's a Civil Case that
is decided on the 'Balance of Probabilities' and Cases Precedents: jurisprudence consists of all the decisions rendered by the courts on the same or similar issues.

The Fair Game - Dead Agent matter will be another issue to address with more Exibits that
I received recently. Actually, this matter is for the Superior Court to decide on for a Defamation
with Malice Lawsuit -- it's not under the Small Claims jurisdiction or Mandate. However, since it
is a manifestation that directly relates to me filing the complaint with the human rights commission
and the Montreal Lawsuit, I expect the Court Clerk and Judge will consider it all in the big picture.

.

And we would expect Skank to try to slime her way out of anything that would force her to be responsible for her actions on behalf of a criminal organisation.

Been an interesting past few days of WTH? - LOL

Was someone pissed at my Wire Service story yesterday?

http://www.wireservice.ca/index.php?module=News&func=display&sid=16723

Is someone concerned about my book being published next week? (DANTE'S EIGHTH CIRCLE)

http://www.smartpeopletoday.com/

http://smartpeopletoday.net/2015/08/09/links-scientology-narconon-resources-books-media/

Or, is someone pissed that I Registered the Domain name <idealnarconon.com>

THIS MORNING someone sent me a PHISHING email that could have been a disaster if I had not caught
it right away and called a GoDaddy Rep to look into and fix it:

http://smartpeopletoday.net/author/smartpeopletoday/

David Love’s GoDaddy Narconon Websites Hacked from Russia Email Account

Spoke to Montreal Court Clerk again and Case is still awaiting a Trial Date. I the meantime, I was
informed that I can submit additional Exhibits up until 15 days prior to Court Hearing date.

Intend to file a 'MOTION' concerning the document I just received, compelling entities to comply
with my 'Access to Information' request.

SKANKS FOR THE MEMORIES!

^^^^ "Skanks for the Memories" LOL!!!! Love it!
I will see your Frank and raise you a Peggy Lee's "The Party's Over"

THIS ^^^ book release has kept Me/We very busy past few weeks, but we're so close now,
I can taste it.

Today, I submitted another 25 pages for review with the Quebec Government... requesting
they order an Entity to comply with my request for access to information/documents.

Another request will be submitted to the COS Montreal under the correct statute for access
to info/dox. This is a no-brainer and they must comply or be fined.

NN TR is another matter, and the Montreal Court will receive a motion to order NN TR to comply
or suffer the legal consequences.







Hang on tight, Jean Latrine Lariviere, the Dox-Man cometh

Hang on tight, Jean Latrine Lariviere, the Dox-Man cometh





Dave is the Dox-Man Ku Ku Ka Choo..............



Note to DM, Scientology's abusive little ecclesiastical punk puke rat bastard: Get Back!

I/We have just started... last night, to upload thousands of dox to one of my websites for reference
to pages in my book. It's a nasty, grueling task because there is so many. We're just laying it out now,
and there will be revisions. Only about 350 pages thus far have been posted.

Going to post some dox never seen before and they're NOT online anywhere, but must REDACT
some names of Students.

Patients 'Grasshoppers' .. we'll get 'em ALL up asap.

LINK: http://smartpeopletoday.net/

Hillary Clinton has a couple of freshly wiped servers for sale, you'll have to hire some secret service agents to physically stand guard over it in your closet to protect it from intrusion ...............

Here we go again with just under 300 pages of new Exhibits ( P- 12 TO P- 15) for the Respondents and
their Lawyers to read with their morning tea.

Another 305 pages of Exhibit dox being sent tomorrow morning.

Reminds me of that song about, "The foot bone connects to the ankle bone. The ankle bone connects to the shin bone. Etc., etc.", but with narCONons.

Sort of like, NN T-R connects to NN Montreal. NN Montreal connects to...ABLE...connects to Miscavige.

Only it doesn't quite fit the music.

BigBeard

Went down memory lane today and edited a video from Montreal.

Scientology angry at being in their face on edge of sidewalk.

Life is like a box of chocolates, you never know WHO you're going to meet.

In Seattle, at Tony Ortega's book signing, I met a womwn who used to be a member
of the Scientology Montreal ORG, and knows Jean Lavieres quite well. A real piece of
work, we agreed on, and the rest I'll save for a court hearing.

I remember Dem Bones:

Twiddling my thumbs and searching my mind what to do next. Too many options to choose from.

By book, Dante's Eighth Circle: Why Scientology's Narconon Must Be stopped ..... is selling all over.
More details on that Thread Here: (and what we're doing next)

https://whyweprotest.net/threads/bo...narconon-must-be-stopped.130243/#post-2556348

Will contact the Montreal Court Clerk again this week to see if a court hearing date is set, and
prepare for the battle soon, I hope. IMO, I think, just like the Human Rights Commission
and College of Physicians cases, this Lawsuit is a no-brainer once the Judge reads the Exhibits
and hears testimony. Have two media reporters interested in being at the Trial.

There is evedence going to be presented that is NOT in my book ... for good reason.

Once the Lawsuit is over, we will add the 80 or so pages back in the book and publish with
a mainstream company.

Working on another batch of Exhibits today in reference to serious fraud.

The Quebec Ministry of Health accepted my evidence that Narconon was having
patients sign their Program Contracts, agreements and other documents when the Patients first arrived at Narconon. These patients were intoxicated when presented the documents to sign.

Incapacity in contract law generally means a person who is not mentally sound, which can include being intoxicated. Persons who are intoxicated cannot legally enter into a contract and intoxication thereby makes the contract voidable.

In essence, these patients did not have the mental capacity to form intent, and the Quebec government agreed. Narconon Trois-Riviers was forced to wait until after the patient was out of the detox-withdrawl unit before the documents were signed.

But there's more to this - the fraud:

Before I flew to Quebec for the Narconon Program, I was on Unemployment Insurance (EI) benefits of about $789.00 bi-weekly from being laid off work. These were not sickness-leave benefits.

While at a detox in Vancouver, I was coerced over the phone to sign over my EI benefit payments to Narconon Trois-Rivieres to pay for the program. The NN Execs approved of this transaction.

When I arrived at NN TR, I immediately had to sign their contracts and agreements, then sent to the detox-withdrawal unit. I had no idea what I signed at the time and didn't care.

Narconon staff coerced my ATM PIN number from me and the EI codes to fill out the
online forms to have my bi-weekly benefits deposited into my bank, Then, they simply used my ATM card to withdraw the funds.

In Canada, when a person is laid off and receiving EI benefits, the online government form has defined questions that must be answered truthfully. Such as:

1) "Are you willing and able to work?" NN TR answered YES

Obviously, I wasn't willing and able to work, I was in the Narconon rehab program.

The other question was:

1) "Have you moved or is your address changed?" NN TR answered NO

NN TR Staff answered both answers incorrect and is FRAUD under the ACT.

http://www.servicecanada.gc.ca/eng/ei/fraud/fraud_serious.shtml

Employment Insurance and Fraud

"When someone intentionally provides false or misleading information about a claim, it is considered to be fraud."

Just off phone with Montreal Court Clerk and calling back in about 20 minutes.

Will update then...

EDIT:

300+ pages of Exhibits just arrived at the Montreal Courthouse and will take them a few days to sort. Asked to call them back in a week to discuss pending Court Trial Date etc.

CANADA
Tuesday, October 6, 2015 8:35 AM
DELIVERED
Tuesday, October 6, 2015 3:16 AM
ARRIVAL AT POST OFFICE
Monday, October 5, 2015 1:05 PM
CUSTOMS CLEARANCE PROCESSING COMPLETE
Monday, October 5, 2015 1:03 PM
PROCESSED THROUGH SORT FACILITY
Monday, October 5, 2015 1:03 PM
CUSTOMS CLEARANCE
NEW YORK, NY, USA
Wednesday, September 30, 2015 9:54 AM
PROCESSED THROUGH SORT FACILITY
Wednesday, September 30, 2015 9:49 AM
ARRIVED AT SORT FACILITY
SEATTLE, WA, USA
Saturday, September 26, 2015 1:15 AM
DEPARTED USPS FACILITY

Speaking of fraud, when the accountants go over their books after the judgement goes against them, have them look for "loans" from the corporations(s) to it's officers that have no record of ever being paid back. It's a sneaky way for corporate officers to skim money while appearing to be legal and above board.

BigBeard

Indeed, I expect their books to be a can of ugly worms, and NN TR very likely was given a substantial
interest free loan from the cherch to pay off the other two victims and their lawyer fees.

If NN TR files for Bankrupcy, I will demand that the Trustee goes over NN TR's books in detail, and
hopefully have Revenue Canada have a good look too.

As of this afternoon, the Montreal Court Clerk informed me that the 3 Respondents have not submitted
ANY Exhibits, but they have until 15 days prior to the Trial to do so. I have submitted 19 Exhibits to the
Court and compilimg additional documents and a two hour audio recording (legally obtained) for the
Court to hear.

All of the Resondents MOTIONS to dismiss have been denied, and I just filed another MOTION for
Summary Judgement which quite likely will be denied.

Even though NN TR/COS et al. can not be represented by a Lawyer in Small Claims, I suspect their
legal bills are climbing considering the hundreds of pages of Exhibits and MOTIONS I have submitted
that their Lawyer reveiwed.

AND, the Interest on the 'Principle' amount, plus, court costs, plus 'additional indemnity' is adding up
monthly.

For obvious reasons, I can't post about many issues involved in this Case on WWP - I'll save for the Trial.

Man, you are good at finding all those little things the great Homo novi seems to glance over


Remind me never to get on your wrong side, Dave!