Customize

Drones

Discussion in 'News and Current Events' started by Anonymous, Apr 2, 2012.

  1. DeathHamster Member

    Ha ha! Called it!

    https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy...s-requirement-that-hobbyists-register-drones/
    • Like Like x 1
  2. The Wrong Guy Member

    Drone Registry Repeal a Victory for Permissionless Innovation

    Hobbyists freed from shackles of new FAA regulations.

    By Andrea O'Sullivan, Reason, May 24, 2017

    Quote:

    Model aircraft enthusiasts and small-scale drone hobbyists enjoyed a major victory last week when a federal court struck down the Federal Aviation Administration's (FAA) controversial non-commercial small drone registration mandate. On May 19, the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals invalidated the FAA's requirement that recreational operators of "small Unmanned Aircraft Systems," or UASs, weighing between 0.55 and 55 lbs. must register their crafts with the agency or risk fines and even jail time.

    The registry is nullified — at least for now — and sUAS buffs are once again free to zip around the troposphere without getting a go-ahead from the FAA first. Incredibly, this big win for permissionless innovation and tinkerers across America comes to us thanks to a single dedicated model aircraft enthusiast named John A. Taylor who just happened to be a lawyer who knew that the FAA was breaking the law.

    The FAA rules, first promulgated in December of 2015, came as a major surprise to the many hopeful small drone sellers for that year's Christmas season. Suddenly, tiny toys not much different from the remote-control helicopters that were a gift staple in holidays past would be considered UASs under the express oversight of the nation's aviation authority. In fact, in the eyes of former Transportation Secretary Anthony Foxx, little Timmy with his new drone would be considered an "aviator" and "with that title comes a great deal of responsibility." Small drone buyers would need to first pay to register the gadget with an FAA website and mark it with the assigned identification number before allowing their child to enjoy their coveted new toy.

    But another group took particular umbrage with the new rules: model aircraft enthusiasts, who had previously been exempt from this kind of regulation. It's not hard to sympathize with their plight. These small and responsible of DIYers had been safely flying their crafts with no issue long before "drones" were a household name. For decades, model aircraft activity had a de facto deregulatory assurance because the recreational community adequately policed its own. Specifically, the Academy of Model Aeronautics (AMA) maintained its own voluntary registration system and enforced community-based safety standards that obviated the need for (and likely exceeded the potential outcomes of) government-driven regulations. Indeed, since 1981, the FAA itself encouraged this kind of voluntary arrangement by merely offering guidelines that the model aircraft community could follow.

    In a nod to the effectiveness of this self-policing arrangement, Congress passed the FAA Modernization and Reform Act of 2012, which explicitly carved out a space for the model aircraft community to continue to tinker without the FAA breathing down their necks. Section 336 of the Act clearly states that the FAA may not "promulgate any rule or regulation regarding a model aircraft." It's hard to get more clear-cut than that. But the FAA nevertheless ignored Congress and proceeded with its half-baked drone registration program despite the major logistical and legal issues involved.

    This is where Taylor and his one-man crusade against FAA wrongdoing comes in. Taylor is a model plane hobbyist and insurance lawyer who lives in the Washington, D.C., area. Like others in his community, he was distressed by the FAA's sudden about-turn on model aircraft. Says Taylor: "I wanted to be able to fly my drone and I didn't want to have to register. It pissed me off on a very sort of visceral level." But unlike many of his comrades-in-flight, he had a law background that helped him prepare a solid legal case against FAA malfeasance. In his petition to the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals, Taylor challenged both the legality of the registration requirement broadly as well as new flight restrictions that the FAA imposed on the area in its Advisory Circular 91-57A.

    Taylor argued that the FAA's new rule that model aircraft operators pay to register their crafts with the agency or face fines or jail time was, indeed, a rule. The FAA countered by essentially arguing that while it didn't enforce its authority against recreational model aircraft operators in the past, it could have if it wanted to. The court agreed with Taylor, finding the FAA's argument that it was allowed to make that rule anyway "unpersuasive." (Unfortunately for amateur model aircraft operators in the D.C. area, Taylor's second argument against the flight restrictions was thrown out for missing the 60-day challenge deadline.)

    And as the Drone Law blog points out, the case provides an interesting exception to the common judicial practice of deferring to an administrative body's interpretation of congressional statute, known as "Chevron deference."

    But model aircraft operators and small drone tinkerers may not be out of the woods yet. The FAA seems dead set in its convictions that small crafts present a clear and present danger to the airspace, and very few regulatory agencies like being told that some slightly-related is simply off limits for control. As the new congressional FAA reauthorization bill looms on the horizon, it is possible that the FAA will take this opportunity to either persuade lawmakers to change the law to their liking, or seize on new ambiguities to attempt to exert their authority once more.

    Even without a change to the law, sUAS operators whose crafts do not clearly meet the definition of a "model aircraft" might still be required to register, at least in the eyes of the FAA. As of this writing, the FAA registration website is still operational, and does not provide much new information about how the decision will affect its internal policies.

    Still, Taylor's larger victory over the outrageous small recreational drone registry is comfort enough to the many small craft hobbyists who now enjoy a little bit more freedom in their own pursuits. And the challenge to regulatory overreach is noteworthy in its own right. As Taylor told Andrew Zaleski of Technical.ly, "The FAA now realizes they can't run roughshod over the hobby or people will challenge them. I believe that, in itself, is a significant victory."

    Source: http://reason.com/archives/2017/05/24/drone-registry-repeal-a-victory-for-perm

    News updates: https://www.google.com/search?q=FAA drones&tbm=nws&tbs=sbd:1
  3. DeathHamster Member

    http://gizmodo.com/dji-will-cripple-your-drone-if-you-dont-register-it-on-1795427600
    This has nothing to do with national laws; this is corporate CYA, and an excellent argument in favor of open source.
    • Like Like x 1
  4. The Wrong Guy Member

    • Dislike Dislike x 1
  5. DeathHamster Member

  6. The Wrong Guy Member

    DJI Is Locking Down Its Drones Against a Growing Army of DIY Hackers | Motherboard

    Drone hackers have forced DJI into an arms race.

    Quote:

    The tension between drone pilots who want complete control over their aircraft that they bought and DJI, the world's biggest consumer grade drone maker, has come to a head. An arms race between hackers and the company is earnestly underway.

    On YouTube, Facebook, drone forums, and Slack groups around the internet, hackers have published instructions for altering the firmware on DJI's drones, leading to a rising number of drone pilots who have circumvented flight restrictions imposed by DJI on its products. In recent days the company has updated its software to render these hacks moot, and has started removing vulnerable versions of its firmware from its servers in an attempt to regain control of its drones.

    DJI told me on Friday it will continue to investigate cases of unauthorized modification and that it will "issue software updates to address them without further announcement."

    "Unauthorized modification of a DJI drone is not recommended, as it can cause unstable flight behavior that could make operating the drone unsafe," Victor Wang, DJI's technology security director, told me in a statement. "DJI is not responsible for the performance of a modified drone and we strongly condemn any user who attempts to modify their drone for illegal or unsafe use."

    "This is the beginning of the fight for DJI to retain control of these aircraft," consumer drone expert Kevin Finisterre, who this week developed and released his own DJI exploit, told me in an email. "End users are more invigorated than ever with the desire to emancipate their drone."

    Drone hacks go DIY

    In June, I reported about a Russian company called Coptersafe that's dedicated to helping pilots alter their drone firmware to evade DJI's no-fly zone, altitude, and speed limits, restrictions that the company says inform pilots who want to fly according to regulations. Coptersafe was selling its hacks for more than $200 per device, but in recent weeks, DIY hackers have reverse-engineered the Coptersafe software and have released it for free, leading to its proliferation around the internet.

    Though DJI says its no-fly zones are voluntary guidelines that can be circumvented with approval from the company, pilots see them as an infringement of their ownership rights. The company removed versions of its firmware that are vulnerable to hacking from its servers, and if DJI drones that already had vulnerable firmware installed connected to the internet, the drones would auto-update to a less vulnerable version of the software.

    Continued at https://motherboard.vice.com/en_us/...-drones-against-a-growing-army-of-diy-hackers
  7. DeathHamster Member

    Yeah, that's not going to end well for DJI. People usually think that they own a product that they paid money for.

    DJI Is Locking Down the Drones it Sold Against a Growing Army of Owners

    fixedit.

    I'm sure that ISIS will be devastated, and will be unable to buy any DJI knock-offs. Oh wait...

    https://www.alibaba.com/showroom/drone.html
    • Like Like x 1
  8. Jeff Jacobsen Member

    I just bought a DJI Spark. You have to force close the app when you're done or it will suck the life out of your battery. But the Spark itself is a dream.

  9. DeathHamster Member

    Why anyone flying near an airport should be punched in the cock:

  10. The Wrong Guy Member

    Mexican Cartel Tactical Note #21: Cartel Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs)

    Small Wars Journal, August 1, 2014

    http://smallwarsjournal.com/blog/mexican-cartel-tactical-note-21

    Drone carrying 6 pounds of meth falls in Tijuana

    Borderland Beat, January 21, 2015

    http://www.borderlandbeat.com/2015/01/drone-carrying-6-pounds-of-meth-falls.html

    Two youngsters found guilty of drug trafficking with drones

    Borderland Beat, August 14, 2015

    http://www.borderlandbeat.com/2015/08/two-youngsters-found-guilty-of-drug.html

    Mexican Cartel Tactical Note #35: Weaponized Drone/UAV/UAS Seized in Valtierrilla, Guanajuato with Remote Detonation IED (‘Papa Bomba’) Payload

    Small Wars Journal, October 23, 2017

    http://smallwarsjournal.com/jrnl/art/mexican-cartel-tactical-note-35

    Game of Drones: Mexico’s Cartels Have a Deadly New Weapon

    Weaponized drones – ISIS-style aerial IEDs – are just the latest paramilitary hardware the cartels are adding to the their arsenals.

    The Daily Beast, November 12, 2017

    https://www.thedailybeast.com/game-of-drones-mexicos-cartels-have-a-deadly-new-weapon

Share This Page

Customize Theme Colors

Close

Choose a color via Color picker or click the predefined style names!

Primary Color :

Secondary Color :
Predefined Skins