Jan Eastgate head of CCHR ARRESTED

Subj: CCHR Call To Arms
Folks,
Thanks a lot to all of you who already helped out on this rush cycle; for those who haven’t here is the info:
Our president, Jan Eastgate needs your help. She is right now in Australia, launching a huge battle against a major psych who got $11 million for labeling & drugging toddlers as young as 3 years old!!!!
Major research investigations are ongoing to combat this and we need to raise an additional $8700 to pull this off. Please flow $100/$200/$500 or whatever you can!
Can you please help?
Contact John now!
Best,
John B Fleming
CCHR International
Cell: 727 647-2692 or john@protectinghumanrights.org
PS: THIS IS WHY “Mental health testing planned for three-year-olds as part of early intervention program”http://www.news.com.au/national/men...rvention-program/story-e6frfkvr-1226054984408
Do not forward – for you only!
If you would rather not receive these e-mails,
reply to john@protectinghumanrights.org with “Unsubscribe Me” in the subject line

• • 
    
    
    
    Hey Jones. Arrogance? Defending someone who is saving the lives of hundreds of thousands of kids whose parents took them off dangerous meds that induce suicide ideation. CCHR exposed the drugs and their work has long since been vindicated in black box warnings that came as a direct result of their exposes. No. Not arrogance. Very simply presenting a sane viewpoint in the midst a complete stonewalling of the truth. If you believe a word of what Ortega says about Scientology after watching his agenda, I have a great bridge for sale over the East River--for you...cheap.
    
    
    
    Sandra Gortez liked this Like Reply

• 
  
  
  
  
  
  
  subgenius
  0 minutes ago
  in reply to Geo Caliban
  
  
  
  
  you would know about being sold bridges
  and the other stuff you say?
  its made up and you can't prove the stuff you say
  i know you believe it and while that may make it true for you
  it doesn't make it true
  
  but I am fascinated as to why $cientologists would expend any energy writing comments on a blog in the village voice
  do you think you are going to change any of the minds here, or what?
  village voice readers have generally "been to town" and fairly informed
  why do do you bother? Its ok with me but its rather pointless, no?

don't see a date there and don't want to click any of those lings

I saw the date on ESMB in a later post by POOKS its a recent e-mail sent out after Jan was arrested....

6/2/11
ESMB was the source of the leek not Martyrs
http://www.forum.exscn.net/showthread.php?23470-Leak-Jan-Eastgate-Scios-lying-to-raise-funds/page5

http://markrathbun.wordpress.com/2011/06/02/99-problems/#comments

slightly ironic the scilon on the ortega blog talks about selling ortega a bridge, no?
paging Dr. Freud.

thanks, its obviously relevent
they'll certainly get more $ that way than saying what its really for
until even the brainwashed figure it out

oooooh I think I'm working on a theory: that there's stuff that's so stupid even brainwashed people can't buy it
we may be approaching that point in this struggle

I comm'd with Tony 2 days ago.

that's good
comm'd means communicated with?
and the substance of the communication would make a difference
and anon posting the link is good too, no?

Just posting in the most awesome thread of the year. Yah, I know I'm late to the party.

People who choose to be delusional about Scientology will still buy it.

If no such case existed and any of this money was used for her defense it would be FRAUD. I wonder if INTERPOL or the prosecutors in Australia would like to know about this. No doubt if he is US based I would like to think the feds should know about this. It is a solicitation under false pretense.

This is so cool that you brought a loud speaker!
I love it how you have style even when protesting. Black suit, white tie, white gloves and a beret. [just in case anybody had a doubt that you were French].

Awesome

Bien jouee

Jens

Inb4: they ban all tv from their compounds.

So what do guys have planed against that failsuit they got going against your government?

They put french state to the court yesterday and they want 1M€.
Scientology = Crazy group.

We will be on tv :
monday 6th June at 22H25(local) on Canal+
tuesday 7th June at 20h40(local) on ARTE.

Screen captures plox.

too late...

I

I demand youtube vidoes!!!!! Give em he'll brothers!

na

Nancy Cartwright thinks out loud: "But I sent them $9000..."

MELBOURNE: Protesting Jan Eastgate's IAS Lecture - May 29th . (2010 WWP thread)

Apologies, late to this Thread of the Year. Not sure if this scilon promo image was re-posted yet. If so, ISCOHB

old related thread

Psych supporter of CCHR calls Psychology a religion

Ex-CCHR assistant, blog from last year . (2010 WWP thread)

Mentions Jan Eastgate

Yeah, I'm a dick for triple quadruple posting. So sue me. I'm half fucking dead already.

For anyone who can be arsed to do the digging, Ken Moxon's wife is the Director of Field Activities of CCHR.

CCHR 40th Anniversary, LA, February 2009

I strongly suspect Moxon and associates will not be helping Jan Eastgate in any way, but will be throwing her under a bus as soon as possible to get her to SHUT THE FUCK UP.

anyone got a pic of her?

There once was an Eastgate kerfluffle
'cause Jan tried to cover up trouble.
To cops she did lie
about what and why
then Jan disconnected her daughter.

http://forums.whyweprotest.net/thre...poetry-and-song-with-cchr.59701/#post-1224408

I had to stop 4 sentences in, or things were going to get broken in my house.

GRAAAAAAGH!

That's some quality enturbulation!

some of the best comments i've ever seen on the ortega blog

I love you glorious bastards.

Nope but I did learn that all you need to win a legal debate is talking smack.

Well, yeah. Haven't you ever been on YouTube?

They could throw her under the bus AND keep the moneys!

ling to content ?

I like to restimulate this incident on the anon timetrack

Cat Daddy | June 2, 2011 at 8:54 pm | Reply

Next ploy of Miscavige to get money:
http://markrathbun.wordpress.com/2011/06/02/99-problems/#comments
Subj: CCHR Call To Arms
Folks,
Thanks a lot to all of you who already helped out on this rush cycle; for those who haven’t here is the info:
Our president, Jan Eastgate needs your help. She is right now in Australia, launching a huge battle against a major psych who got $11 million for labeling & drugging toddlers as young as 3 years old!!!!
Major research investigations are ongoing to combat this and we need to raise an additional $8700 to pull this off. Please flow $100/$200/$500 or whatever you can!
Can you please help?
Contact John now!
Best,
John B Fleming
CCHR International
Cell: 727 647-2692 or john@protectinghumanrights.org
PS: THIS IS WHY “Mental health testing planned for three-year-olds as part of early intervention program”http://www.news.com.au/national/men...rvention-program/story-e6frfkvr-1226054984408
Do not forward – for you only!
If you would rather not receive these e-mails,
reply to john@protectinghumanrights.org with “Unsubscribe Me” in the subject line

• 
  
  View attachment abc0a0fad258501b591303752c93973a?s=48&d=identi Howard Roark | June 2, 2011 at 9:22 pm | Reply
  
  The Lie Factory never stops.
  Amazing.
• 
  
  View attachment 1dfb7cf6bf6844e7a1aef7b428365a1f?s=48&d=identi Crusader | June 2, 2011 at 10:41 pm | Reply
  
  That’s awesome. They are actually just trying to raise her bail money to reimburse whoever bailed her out after being arrested last week in AUS for obstruction of justice. Very timely considering the last post.
• 
  
  View attachment dde5a497f6a9713a8ebb143694591797?s=48&d=identi meme | June 2, 2011 at 11:09 pm | Reply
  
  But didn’t this just happen? http://www.theaustralian.com.au/new...sex-abuse-victim/story-e6frg6nf-1226066045613
  maybe I’m late to the game on that one
• 
  
  View attachment 603960d6ef9d821f99aa9d16bed9157b?s=48&d=identi RJ | June 2, 2011 at 11:11 pm | Reply
  
  That’s funny CD
  Basic assumption is that Scientologists are either a bunch of ludites or have received the “SRA” not to venture beyond the limits of their Net Nanny ScienoSitter and find out what is really going on with Jail bird Jan and that instead of fighting the evil psyches they’re actually paying for posting her bail.
  “Shore stories” by definition have a certain degree of truth and are basically conflicting rumors while this is just utter fabrication.
  What Ron says about PR being like a cocked Spanish pistol which is very similar to a cheap “Saturday Night Special” definitely applies here.
  Along with foot bullet when the public get a glimmer of what is really going on and find out they’ve been lied to about the great Jan Eastgate patron saint of pedophiles.
  No way CCHR or anyone else is ever going to be able to “walk back this cat”.
  What ever is left of that decadent house of cards that Jan built they falsely call the “Citizen’s Commission of Human Rights” probably won’t survive the blow back from this escapade.
  Well Done Jan you’ll probably be receiving your honorary SMERSH membership soon.
  Something you can hang on cell wall.
  • 
    
    View attachment b97c68e3b48966953075c82e7f6875fc?s=48&d=identi LDW | June 3, 2011 at 12:06 am | Reply
    
    So much of their fund raising is fraudulent. This pretty much takes the cake.
    Imagine truth in advertizing:
    Hey, guys, several years ago our hero Jan Eastgate talked a little girl and her mom into lying to the police so one of our patrons could stay out of jail. Oh, nothing important, the guy was just sexually abusing the little girl. But anyway, our hero Jan just got caught and we need some big bucks for her bail and damage control and to hire a really really expensive defense atty. Need your support right away…
    Might go easy on your next sec check if you cough up some dough.

• • • 
      
      View attachment 603960d6ef9d821f99aa9d16bed9157b?s=48&d=identi RJ | June 3, 2011 at 1:49 am | Reply
      
      Les,
      I’m proud to say that the only cause I ever donated to in all my time in the Church of Scientology was the SEF because I believed that Mary Sue deserved the best defense we could muster.
      (I wasn’t too jazzed about some of that money going to Jane Kember’s defense as well but it was a package deal )
      So I broke my piggy bank and gave ‘em an outrageous sum of 35 bucks and some change.
      (I mean I was punk kid back then on staff so to me that was a freakin’ fortune!)
      Older and wiser (“My Back Pages” en contrare ) the IAS comes along demanding money for this or that and I tell ‘em basically not in those exact words to go f-ck themselves.
      Told ‘em I was staff and AOLA pays for my membership so I don’t have to waste the money basically.
      (you could say that me and the IAS never saw eye to eye which at that time wasn’t the crime that it later became.
      Nor did my wife who was a proud HASI member.)
      The only time I was ever forced to pay for their overpriced membership was when I wasn’t on staff and wanted to do a course or when we had a big FSMC comin’.
      Yet here were these suckers forking out 10, 15, sometimes 100 grand a pop to these dildos.
      Could never figure out why?
      If I ever bothered to think about it.
      I mean I figured out that the IAS was a fraud and a scam when I had the inside “skinny” from an old GO now OSA friend of mine who told me the main reason for eliminating HASI and the CSC was to avoid paying Wollershiem “one thin dime” as the saying went.
      That’s when I figured out that the IAS was nothing but a shell game in other words basically a money laundering op and nothing more.
      More accurately a donation racket.
  • 
    
    View attachment cbf44669bf5c6d83d113b92080687a0a?s=48&d=identi Mike Hobson | June 3, 2011 at 8:38 pm | Reply
    
    @RJ – AFAIK, there hasn’t been any “NetNanny ScientoSitter” since Windows XP was released (c. 2002).
    Michael A. Hobson
• 
  
  View attachment f804ebae505b46ee4162c82c04c94eb5?s=48&d=identi DFB | June 3, 2011 at 2:35 am | Reply
  
  I was just watching this and I thought it shoudl be the Church’s theme song. They could play it right before Miscavige walks on stage:
  
• 
  
  View attachment 2aa1282f9c5e1f8e630873baa995ed35?s=48&d=identi Just Me | June 3, 2011 at 1:01 pm | Reply
  
  Know what else this means? It means Jan Eastgate is on her own. Kicked to the curb. Miscavige is not footing her legal bill. CCHR and she are genning up the funds for her bail and legal defense.
  Gee, Jan. Feeling the lack of love yet?
  Better yet … let me guess: You originated you did NOT want the $hurch’s support, right? You jumped into the breach to be cause, right? You volunteered to be responsible, right? You wanted to be right, not wrong, right?
  What a ball of snakes and considerations and confusions you have entwined yourself with. And if you’re going to ride that steed all the way around the track, get ready to finish last.
  JM
• 
  
  View attachment 62094ea8485520b990be9f9d0dd38dd2?s=48&d=identi theoracle | June 3, 2011 at 8:56 pm | Reply
  
  Cell: 727 647-2692
  I feel a sin coming on.
  • 
    
    View attachment a1049d2528a46f6bd92dca4577fd768f?s=48&d=identi Cat Daddy | June 4, 2011 at 5:55 pm | Reply
    
    have fun

I was suspecting that, too, but she might be too integral to their public image. They might also think they have some reasonably good defenses. They will only throw her under a bus if they lose, I think, or if they clearly are going to lose. The problem for them is that if she loses, it's strong evidence that can be used in a civil suit against them. While I'm not sure of the exact contours of Australia's evidence rules, I can't imagine there isn't a way to get it in. She'd be a necessary witness, and it would certainly impeach her if she didn't testify honestly, that she is convicted of perverting the course of justice in the same case the civil suit would be about.

Therefore, they might not be able to afford throwing her under the bus, especially if she then turns around and cuts a deal in return for a lighter sentence and the government decides to go after the cult itself. That's pure speculation, but you can be sure they're thinking about it. Also, if they provide the legal defense, they will be able to control the defense strategy so it doesn't impact the cult. This is, of course, completely against legal ethics (legal counsel is obligated to be absolutely loyal to the person they are representing and not who is paying their check), but I've rarely seen Scientology lawyers let little things like ethics get in their way. If they do, they get replaced pretty quickly.