Mark Rathbun "Disconnects" Safe. My Messages to Marty Further below is the link to my blog comment message to Marty on his blog. (If he hasn't decided to delete it.) I never dreamed I'd ever be writing this here on WWP, but I've finally woken up to what I believe what Marty's intentions really are, and I feel compelled to warn others, scientologists and anons. Though I'm likely preaching to the aware choir here. Mark (Marty) Rathbun is censoring rational, decorum debate on his blog, even censoring scientologists, not just Anons. IMO, by doing so, he is acting no better than CofS. Why is he doing this? Because I believe he's covering up his true intention. IMO, he's in a war to take down David Miscavage, not because it's the right thing to do, but because, I fear, he wants to take over the lead position of power in CofS himself. Mark Rathbun is deceiving and lying to independent scientologists (through censorship), and using his public trust of scientologists to gain "authority" with his aggression against David Miscavage. That he uses censorship on his blog is repulsive to the idea of Free Speech, and, ironically, even to the scientology creed. He spits on both. My concern is that if he does succeed in a deceiving Church of Scientology coup, that we will end up with the same shit, from just a different person. Tyranny always begins with censorship to dominate others. That Marty is already exercising censorship on his blog should send up a huge red warning flag that he's obsessed with control, just like David Miscavage. Here is the link to my comment, that Marty hesitantly (I'm sure) decided to post after I challenged his courage to post it by quoting Mike Rinder, who said, "What are you, a pussy?" to David Labau... http://markrathbun.wordpress.com/20...-coast-to-coast-the-mosquitoes/#comment-56162 (The above text is long, I admit. But I thought the length of it was necessary to properly deliver what I wanted to say. My intention was to communicate to the most educated folks there who have no problem with reading, not to Marty's minion worshippers.) Marty replied to this message with a curt and snide remark, of which I replied back to, however, he censored it from other scientologists there. My reply is not there. It's gone. Deleted. Censored. So here is THAT reply to his snide "demand and punishment" comment, which I have posted here, and that he did not have the courage to approve, for scientologists and non-scientologist there to read: "Marty, I'm actually thrilled you posted my opinion. Thank you. That took courage, and I admire and appreciate that. Why don't you use logical debate with me? You have "proven" absolutely nothing with your reply. Instead, you're demonstrating your unwillingness to confront and debate my points, Marty. The truth is, you just proved the entire point of my "diatribe" (with your inval, eval, threat, punishment) by your expressed desire to thought-stop yet even again with your threat to me (or punishment if you follow through) by censoring me again, when you said, 'it'll be your last one [post] here.' Do you really think you're validly proving your point by shutting me out? You are doing quite clearly the opposite. Aware scientologists and critics will easily see that. You're bare naked. You're nailed, Marty. You clearly practice unreasonable censoring and thought-stopping, Marty, when it's an opinion you obviously don't like. You admitted it silently by not denying you practice it. In my message, I gave you every opportunity to do so. I hope others wake up to what you are doing here. That is not practicing scientology by respecting its creed. You spit on it. So if you don't "approve" this reply to your curt and snide comment, you'll have 100% proven my point ... once again, about your censorship. Why not try confronting your own evil, first, before you go about judging others' wrongnesses?"