Customize

Marty, Tony Ortega, Ray Jeffrey, 2 other lawyers, and 2 private investigators meet

Discussion in 'Independent Scientology' started by Anonymous, Sep 26, 2012.

  1. Anonymous Member

    From your mouth to Bob's Holy Ear.
  2. Anonymous Member

    What's Pat Broeker going to say? Or rather, what possible thing could Pat Broeker say that a) he could back up and b) would make a difference.

    I'm sure it would by lulzy, but I don't think he has the magic bullet anymore than Marty does.

    He could back up the claim that Hubbard's will was altered. He might even <tinfoil>support the claim that Hubbard had a little bit of assistance when the dropped the body</tinfoil>.

    But I can't think he has any dox and I am not sure that Scientologists who have managed to ignore every other senior Scientologist who has left wouldn't just ignore him too.
    • Like Like x 1
  3. Anonymous Member

    Its one of his stats - number blowhard threats to Scientology
  4. Anonymous Member

    He could have dox, and Broeker knows where all the pre-coup bodfies were buried. It would be /popcorn, at least.
    • Like Like x 1
  5. Anonymous Member

    LOL @ Marty and his idiotic threats. He is just a big mouth. I am still waiting for that attorney to leave town before sundown. I hope Marty does not audit Ortega, poor thing.
    • Agree Agree x 1
  6. Anonymous Member

    Not sure if serious or just trolling.jpg
  7. Anonymous Member

    Hey Marty! Look:
    2qszdc1.jpg
    • Like Like x 9
    • Winner Winner x 1
  8. Anonymous Member

    Yes. OSA's fake rathbun blog site where they dis all the indies took a small jab at him once.
  9. Anonymous Member

    I agree about /popcorn. I just don't think Broeker is going to bring down the cult.
  10. DeathHamster Member

    If this was a bad cyberpunk novel, Broeker would have Hubbard's special secret Total Self-Destruct Code that would make every Scientologists' head spin, barf pea soup, and then explode.

    Oh well.
    • Funny Funny x 4
  11. Anonymous Member

    I hope he does audit Ortega. Tony will have something to write about.
  12. another123 Member

  13. Anonymous Member

  14. Anonymous Member

    Receiving auditing can be addictive. Better not.
  15. Xinjifar Member

    My prediction; there will be no testimony in a courtroom and under oath.
    • Agree Agree x 2
  16. I know. Just give the guy more to write about.
  17. Just because I'm perfecting the art of wet blanketry, I'll just say that Tony O being the Plaintiff in a lolsuit against the Cult is not a good idea. Here's how most lolsuits involving the Cult play out:

    1. Cult is sued; Cult harasses, follows, files countless motions to delay the suit
    2. Cult tries (and sometimes gets) an injunction to gag all parties while #1 plays out - no bueno for someone who is a writer or stuck to his publisher's schedule (assuming that he has a deal, but he doesn't as far as I know)
    3. Cult strings this suit along for months, possibly years, all the while a gag order keeps Tony O from saying anything at all
    4. Cult settles and there is the risk that Tony O signs a NDA or other gag agreement in order to settle

    I could be very wrong, but this is the typical Cult Lolsuit playbook. We've all seen it before, and I'm sure Tony is well aware of this potential outcome.

    /wetblanket
    • Agree Agree x 4
    • Like Like x 1
  18. jensting Member

    David Love won his first court case and collected the loot some time ago (more than a year ago?). It all depends on the quality of the case - it's not every time that David Miscavige can dodge the courts. Maybe, when he does whatever it is that the "third wheel" in Tom Cruise's marriage does, he's too busy to make it go right...

    Best Regards

    Jens
  19. Ron B DED Member

    Oh please oh please oh please have Marty audit Tony O on the Whole Track Sec Check

    Here's the first few of the hundreds of those auditing questions:

    Whole Track Sec Check

    Have you ever enslaved a population?
    Have you ever implanted anyone?
    Have you ever sacked a city?
    Have you ever sunk, or otherwise destroyed, a non-combatant vessel?
    Have you ever abused hostages, or prisoners?
    Have you ever ordered, or yourself committed, genocide?
    Have you ever annihilated a population?
    Have you ever poisoned food or drinking supplies?
    Have you ever strangled anyone?
    Have you ever deliberately spread disease?
    Have you ever degraded a religion?
    Have you ever raped a child of either sex?
    Have you ever warped an educational system?
    Have you ever deprived people of hope?
    Have you ever committed murder?
    Have you ever destroyed a culture?
    Have you ever forced anyone into an undesired beingness?
    Have you ever stolen a body from another being?
    Have you ever destroyed an economy?
    Is anybody seeking to discover your whereabouts?
    Have you ever violated a nation's neutrality?
    Have you ever broken a treaty?
    Have you ever blanketed bodies for the sensation kick?
    Have you ever upset an ecology?
    Have you persecuted others for their religious or political beliefs?
    Have you ever interfered with the free flow of trade?
    Have you ever been a crook?
    Have you ever obliterated a language?
    Have you ever stamped out a religion?
    Have you ever deliberately trained people in untruths for power, or profit?
    Have you ever defiled religious places, persons, or objects?
    Have you ever practised terrorism?
    Have you ever done anything you would not like to think of yourself as having done?
    Have you ever been a coward?
    Have you ever trapped a thetan?
    Have you ever prided yourself on your wickedness?
    Have you ever destroyed artistic productions, or creations?
    Have you burned literature?
    Have you ever forbidden people to practise their own customs?
    Have you ever perverted a people's customs?
    Have you ever done anything which you hoped would be wiped out by the passage of time?
    Do you deserve to be punished into eternity for something you've done?
    . If so, what is it?
    ...
    • Funny Funny x 3
    • Like Like x 1
  20. Anonymous Member

    Tony is well aware of it which is why I suspect it isn't actually happening. Doesn't mean there aren't useful things he can do with a lawyer. For example, all those proxy registrars that the attack sites hide behind will still give up the registrar info to a court order.
  21. DeathHamster Member

    All what Tony attack sites?

    https://whyweprotest.net/wiki/Front_group_sites
    • Like Like x 1
  22. Anonymous Member

    lol and he is going to sue for ONE comment against him? srsly? pussy :p
  23. Anonymous Member

    OK, who on earth came up with this ridiculous idea that Ortega is going to sue anyone?
    Wouldn't it make more sense that Marty was referring to the fact that the two PIs visited him with their lawyer, and those PIs ARE suing Scientology, while Tortega was there because umm....he reports on "all things Scientology"?
    • Agree Agree x 4
    • Like Like x 1
  24. Anonymous Member

    Yeah, but speculation is the favorite dish around here sometimes. Lets not use logic to cloud up the tinfoil fun.
    • Like Like x 1
    • Funny Funny x 1
  25. RightOn Member

    calling Tony O!
    please clear up this clusterfuck
    k?
  26. Xenu Is Lord Member

    ohhhhh, ohhhhhhhh, ahhhhhhhhh aaaaaaaa IIIII ammmm cumminggggggg!
  27. Anonymous Member

    tony get the fuck away from marthey please plz. it is not good for you :(
  28. Xinjifar Member

    It's not good for anybody. Not even Marteh.
    • Like Like x 1
    • Funny Funny x 1
  29. rickybobby Member

    My belief is that Marty is just throwing crap toward the wall to see what sticks. I don't think he knows what Tony is going to do. From his blog today:

    /quote

    Obnosis | September 28, 2012 at 11:21 pm | Reply
    Did y’all notice Tony has a new blog?

    https://ortegaunderground.wordpress.com/

    martyrathbun09 | September 28, 2012 at 11:25 pm | Reply
    I don’t think that is his blog. It looks like his fans inferring as much.

    Doloras LaPicho | September 29, 2012 at 2:28 am | Reply
    Yeah, it is his blog, he announced it on his new Twitter.

    martyrathbun09 | September 29, 2012 at 6:43 am | Reply
    Thanks.

    /end quote

    That says to me that he and Tony aren't up all night painting each other's nails and spilling their guts to each other... my feeling is that Marty WISHES that's what he would do, but putting it in writing ain't necessarily gonna make it happen. Tony's a smart man. Marty just wants to say stuff to get DM all riled up cuz he hates the tiny man's guts.

    R
    • Agree Agree x 3
    • Like Like x 1
  30. rickybobby Member

    I go there so you don't have to--- the latest post from The Marty:

    /quote

    Scientology Inc. Private Eyes Come Clean
    Posted on September 29, 2012 by martyrathbun09 | Leave a comment
    The Tampa Bay Times has published a rather startling expose’, Scientology Inc. Private Eyes Come Clean.

    Notice that David Miscavige’s denials confirm pretty much the entire story.

    When Paul and Greg asked CO OSA INT (Linda Hammill, head of Scientology Inc.’s intelligence operation) what the church was going to do when I exposed this operation in 2009 to the Times (see, segment ‘Spying on Pat Broeker’ at Marty Rathbun Tampa Times videos), she said that David Miscavige’s plan was to “blame it on Marty.” Greg and Paul knew then and there that Miscavige and his crime syndicate had lost any sense it might have once had.

    Incidentally, this week Greg and Paul helped a documentary film crew video an ongoing Scientology Inc. electronic surveillance operation in my current neighborhood.

    /end quote
    • Like Like x 1
  31. Anonymous Member

    I wonder how much of a cut Marty is trying to get from the lawsuit of the private dicks
  32. Anonymous Member

    Marty Rathbun, the opportunistic asshole
    [IMG]
    • Agree Agree x 1

Share This Page

Customize Theme Colors

Close

Choose a color via Color picker or click the predefined style names!

Primary Color :

Secondary Color :
Predefined Skins