I can understand how a celebrity news agency might react to something posted that they believe was disrespectful of their crusade and noble causes. The article is a puff-piece and you called it the way you saw it. As bottom-feeders they got butt-hurt and took it out on your posted comment. Bottom-feeders aren't known for emotional maturity or intellectual acuity. Perhaps words like 'vapid' or any of these - insipid, uninspired, colorless, uninteresting, feeble, flat, dull, boring, tedious, tired, unexciting, uninspiring, unimaginative, uninvolving, lifeless, tame, vacuous, bland, trite, jejune - could raise the ire of the editors and moderators to the level of assploding heads?