Customize

Monica Lewinsky slut shaming

Discussion in 'General Discussion' started by Disambiguation, May 7, 2014.

  1. Disambiguation Global Moderator

  2. Random guy Member

    As slut shaming goes you'll have to admit this one's quite good though.
    • Like Like x 3
  3. Disambiguation Global Moderator

    Yeah this is tongue in cheek, or cigar in....never mind.
  4. Disambiguation Global Moderator

    41RrlDLHUYL._SY300_.jpg

    Attached Files:

  5. Ogsonofgroo Member

    Poor Monica, caught climbing the social ladder on her knees, paid for it, and still getting slammed by what-ever. I always thought she was kinda cute, and, having been notorious myself, would have enjoyed her slutty company.... for at least a minute or two :p
    • Like Like x 1
  6. Random guy Member

    Whether she was sluting her way up or he was sluting his dick down is an open question. Perhaps they both are equally sluty.
    • Like Like x 3
  7. laughingsock Member

    I am still disgusted at the fact that it's her who is labeled a slut, when in fact it was billy boy who abused his power and lied to the world. Not to mention congress. She was young and drunk on his power and now she's the slut while the Clinton camp gets to pretend they are American royalty.
    • Like Like x 8
  8. tinfoilhatter Member

    Then why not shame Clinton then?
  9. I'm not sure either of the Clintons have any shame or would know when to feel it.
    • Like Like x 8
  10. What I find hilarious is that the Republicans actually like her back in the spotlight...

    ...Too bad this is the year 2014 not 1994, and nobody gives a fuck anymore. That or have seen way worse than a woman who loves cigars in her crotch

    There isn't enough booze, drugs, or hallucinogens on this planet Earth that'd get me even slightly aroused by her for a second, much less fuck her.

    You can have her!

    You have to keep in mind the time frame in which this happened. This was long before a lot of other "sexual misadventures" happened. This was before shit like a congressman trying to get gay sex in a bathroom stall or having more than one congressperson or military big shit having extramarital affairs or playing Grab Ass. Let's not even get into Secret Service dudes getting hookers and blow in Ecuador...

    Also: Mr. Crotch Cigar paid for it greatly despite how it looked. After the dust settled, he had a difficult time getting things done and getting the US to rally behind it. If you remember, Clinton was trying to get ObamaCare long before Obama was even in office or people even knew who Obama was.exactly.

    Not to mention having this jizz stain be part of his presidential legacy. Thanks to this: He became a laughing stock till George W. Bush came along.Some could even say he never really shook it, despite 8 years of Bush Jr.

    It's just the standard Money Talks, Bullshit Walks protocol. The Clintons (or any rich fuck for that matter) had money and could afford a good PR team. She (or anybody else) did not and became the scapegoat even if that was not the case.
    • Like Like x 3
  11. Nancy Beazley Member

    LOL! Stuff like this has happened for centuries. What is new is the Internet. I find it hilarious that aspiring celebrities now follow this career plan:

    1. Make sex tape and release it on the Interwebz.
    2. ?
    3. Profit.
    • Like Like x 3
  12. tinfoilhatter Member

    step two is blame hackers for releasing the sex tape, despite the fact that you leaked it yourself, so that you look like the "victim" and everyone can pretend to feel sorry for you while they fap.
    • Like Like x 2
  13. I have seen the "leaked" porn tape of Paris Hilton. I have seen way better porn. After seeing that abomination, I never went searching for celebrity sex tapes again.

    There is a lot of times what you say is true. Take that liar Dustin Diamond (aka Screech in that pre-internet show Saved By the Bell). He "claimed" he made that video as a joke between friends. Turns out (big fucking surprise!) he not only made the tape in order to feed his worthless career, he hired a porn actor to be a "stunt sex" double.
  14. tinfoilhatter Member


    He would have made more money if it was a legitimate porno. especially thanks to rule 34.
  15. The big reason why people doubted the authenticity of it was because prior to it he was begging people for money. He came up with this story that his house was being foreclosed on and he and his girlfriend were being expelled from his house and was doing this sob story about it.(Keep in mind this happened before the site Kickstarter existed.)

    Turns out he was lying. Bold face too.

    The very first hint was that he was renting the house. So eviction, not foreclosure, would be occurring. After that pesky detail, shit began unraveling fast. Beginning with irradic behavior towards doners and not fulfilling promises for merch. (You got a shirt if you donated a bit of cash... People didn't get shit). Just before the truth was to come out, this "sex tape" "magically" appeared and was "leaked" out on the Interbutts..

    The asshole went further too by writing a book about what went on behind the scenes. Thus pissing off all the former actors and crew of the shows he was on. Later, (probably because of potential threats from lawyers of the former stars who weren't fucking scrubs like him) he turned around and blamed the writer claiming it was "ghost written" and that the writer hyperbole his information.

    So even if this tape was a genuine article and even if it wasn't bullshit, people may have still doubted it considering he keeps lying out his ass. Considering the company he keeps (he was at a couple Gathering of the Juggalos), I think even Rule 34 would not have helped him.
    • Like Like x 1
  16. tinfoilhatter Member


    Dumbass

    Man, this thread derailed fast.
    • Like Like x 1
  17. I'd thumbs that up if I could.

    I don't know.

    In some ways, I suppose it is relevant to this:

    In the case of Dustin Diamond though, it is fully relevant because it's absolutely true.

    Then again, this thread is about Monica Lewinsky and her glorious cum-back. So perhaps more jizz stain jokes will re-rail this train?

    It might help if I knew what the whole point of her "return" has to do with anything. Her getting a lit cigar in her love hole happened close to 20 years ago. If she is trying to embarrass Hillary Clinton, that could have the potential to backfire for both her and the Republicans trying to sling old dirt.

    Believe me: I understand that this has to do with giving Bill some (much deserved) embarrassment, but again this happened years ago, and he is certainly not in any power seat. So it maybe too late for her to get any further respect, even though I get she shouldn't have been treated the way she did.
    • Like Like x 1
  18. tinfoilhatter Member


    Hilary is supposedly planning on running in 2016. So the are going to dig up everything that they can to shoot her down.

    If the republicans want to win the white house in 2016, then i believe a good bet would be Colin Powel, He was smart enough to run away from the bush administration when the chance arose, he is a moderate, and his military experience would win over the hard liner republicans that are tea party obsessed.

    But yeah, this is the political circus starting up.
  19. I agree. It's all a political salvo a bit early.

    However, I would have thought they'd associate Hillary with Obama and his alleged "failures" [Them Republicans loves them some Benghazi right now...] rather than associating her with her husband's past sexual infidelity. If anything, it could potentially backfire as it'd show she's some forgiving, loving wife willing to overcome personal challenges.

    It could also backfire as people might think "Shit! Why are they dragging that crap out again!"

    Granted, I am not going to bet on it but that is a possibility.

    Give yourself a mental thumbs up till I gain the ability to give you one.

    Maybe. He would certainly have a lot of appeal.I'd vote for him or Chris Christie before the Bridgegate Scandal sunk that possible ship. (Christie did tell off Boeiner dragging his feet for help over Superstorm Sandy).

    However, most hard core Republicans might shy away because of Powell's moderation. When you have dumb fucks like Glenn Beck and Rush Limbaugh complain to their zombie followers that the Republican party being watered down by "liberals" (de facto ad hom), it might be a tough sell.
    • Like Like x 1
  20. tinfoilhatter Member

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Whitewater_controversy

    This is why they are digging it up. After 2008, people have lost patience with investment types. and being associated with any type of investment scandal, is the end of your career.

    this is why she will not be president. Granted, this is not as bad as ted Kennedy's Chappaquiddick, but it is still bad.
  21. Yeah. That'd do some damage.

    Which is why I am baffled why they didn't start with that but instead brought back Monica Lewinsky.

    However, she has not officially said she is running. There has been a fuckload of rumors and innuendo saying she willt, but alas they could be just that. Just like it isn't official that Chris is running. (Would be a pity, but that whole bridge deal and all...).

    For the Dems, I am hoping a candidate (other than Clinton mind you) will emerge. The only Repubs I'd want is either Christie or Powell. Jeb Bush would seal the Repub's fate (everybody still remembers the faggotry in FL that caused Bush Jr. to win and his involvement in it) and Sarah Palin is purely inexperienced and an obvious puppet for the Koch bros.
  22. Nancy Beazley Member

    If Monica had ANY sense at all, she would hire a lawyer to tell the Clintons that she needs $10 million never to open her pie hole again.

    She says she can't work because no one will hire her.

    Seriously, I think the girl went about this all wrong. The Republicans won't fund her retirement.
  23. Disambiguation Global Moderator

    She is returning now because she optimizes book sales right now when Hillary is deciding to run or not. No reason she should be kind to Hillary. Hillary thought Bill was innocent and said shitty things about Monica. When it was clear Bill had lied Hillary didn't go back and make things right with Monica.
    • Like Like x 1
  24. If they were smart: They would.

    Monica might be the key in keeping Hillary away from running, or at least that is what they think. It could always backfire, though. However, they'd better take care of their pretty (ugly as Hell) pony or else it might be harder for her to reemerge on cue when they need her.

    Why would a married woman, whether it be Hillary or Repub/Demo, or anybody for that matter, be nice to the secret fuck buddy she had no idea was there?

    Far as I am concerned: Hillary has every right to be angry and nasty to her to a point. Takes two to tango, ya know?
  25. https://www.nytimes.com/2017/05/22/...-region&WT.nav=opinion-c-col-left-region&_r=0

Share This Page

Customize Theme Colors

Close

Choose a color via Color picker or click the predefined style names!

Primary Color :

Secondary Color :
Predefined Skins