Re: Neil Gaiman's Scieno Front Neil Gaiman does benefit from the cult. All donations, including the half a million dollars Neil Gaiman just funneled into Scientology's coffers are tax deductable. When Bank Corp funds a donation, Gaiman benefits tremendously. Gaiman is a victim in the sense that he was raised being audited and taught disturbing, hellish philosophies like the "tone scale," where accountability ranks low. In my mind that is child abuse. Gaiman's father and mother were willing to take children radiated by Chernobyl and expose them to saunas and toxic doses of vitamins, what were they willing to do to him? Scientologists are not educated. Most of them never go to college, including Neil Gaiman, all they know is the idiotic philosophy the cult drills into them. So Gaiman is probably brainwashed to be a self-referential idiot who thinks he is superior, but still, there are adult cult members like Jenny Miscavige, who reason their way out. As an adult with a perfectly servicable brain, Gaiman has chosen to take the benefits the cult offers him, the family fortune made by conning people and screwing their brains and their health up, the Hollywood and publishing connections and the tax deductions. He's chosen to hang onto the family money rather than stand on his own two feet. Every cult member who pumps hundreds of thousands of dollars, or MILLIONS OF DOLLARS, into the cult should be exposed. And the Gaiman clan, who derive a Six million dollar annual income from duping people should certainly be exposed. Neil Gaiman is the same as a corporation funding the Taliban, he's a Scientology underwriter, building Orgs, supplying RPF camps, even funding Scientology's campaigns against Anonymous and it's bullshit. As I said before, Gaiman is both a victim and a a big problem for Anonymous because he is an underwriter of the cult. He would like to do it in secret, the way a child molester wants you to keep quiet about the dirty thing he's doing. Anonymous is here to expose the cult, not issue one of its major underwriters a pass because he would prefer we all shut up so he can continue to roll in the mud. I'm not sure what is meant by "cut him some slack." That the obvious money trail should not documented? That we all ought to collude with Gaiman to hide his connections? This thread serves a few purposes; 1. To document the money trail and amounts of money being funneled into the cult by the high-ranking Scienos, in this case the Gaimans. 2. To profile the Scientology behavior of lying in public about the money trail and the level of involvement in order to get more money. The second point is important because I am seeing a trend where Scientologists hide their activity. This is evidence that Anonymous is having a profound effect on the Scientologists who now want to hide their connections. It's a complicated world and you'll have to hold two disparate things in your mind at the same time. Neil Gaiman is a Scientology victim. Neil Gaiman is a Scientology underwriter.