Customize

New Era Dianetics for Operating Thetans

Discussion in 'Leaks & Legal' started by Anonymous, Oct 1, 2009.

  1. Budd Member

    Re: New Era Dianetics for Operating Thetans

    It's hard to believe that people actually believe this stuff.
  2. Herro Member

    Re: New Era Dianetics for Operating Thetans

    Yeah and some people ritualistically consume the flesh and blood of the human manifestation of God. It's not hard at all to see how people could want to believe this stuff if they're looking for answers.
  3. Anonymous Member

    Re: New Era Dianetics for Operating Thetans

    Yes, the parallels between scientology and a religion whose administrative skill and influence became the catalyst for western civilization, whose roots preceded Jesus by 3000 years, and whose doctrine has largely been the basis of western jurisprudence is inescapeable. My that Hubbard was talented!

    Folks around here need a better education in history.

    We should hope that this idiotic document becomes as widely disseminated as the Bible.
    Maybe Anons could get the Gideons involved and put a copy of LRH's madness in every hotel room. Might be better than the in-room movies.

    Great work Anons, hand this out everywhere!
  4. Anonymous Member

    Re: New Era Dianetics for Operating Thetans

    Hey maybe we should stop leaking because that's what the CoS wants us to do
  5. Anonymous Member

    Re: New Era Dianetics for Operating Thetans

    Maybe we should do Scientology a favor and leak as much as posible, so that it will propagate and thrive forever on the internet. If new cults start to spring up, they will become the competition where there is a monopoly. With this logic, won't that mean there will be more Scientology not less? In many religions in the past, when the government came in and put a stop to religious freedoms, new religious missions would be cloned.
  6. Re: New Era Dianetics for Operating Thetans

    Geir Isene actually suggested officially releasing all of LRH's stuff onto the web.

    "Mass dissemination of 100% Standard Tech, that would allow anyone interested to see for themselves"
  7. Sponge Member

  8. Anonymous Member

    Re: New Era Dianetics for Operating Thetans

    I can haz SOOPAH POWAHS nao?




    SUPER POWER RUNDOWN
    SERIES

    Confidential

    EXECUTIVE DIRECTIVE

    17 December 1978



    RON'S JOURNAL 30


    1978 - THE YEAR OF LIGHTNING FAST NEW TECH



    SUPER POWER. A Super fantastic, but confidential series of
    rundowns that can be done on anyone
    whether Dianetic Clear or not that puts the person into fantastic
    shape unleashing the super power of a
    thetan. This is the means that puts Scientologists into a new
    realm of ability enabling them to create the New
    World. It puts world Clearing within reach in the future. This is
    a parallel rundown to Power in Saint Hills
    which is taken by the Dianetic Clear. It consists of 12 separate
    highpower rundowns which are brand new
    and enter realms of the tech never before approached. Power is
    still very much in use on the Grade Chart but
    is for those who didn't go Clear on Dianetics. Super Power will be
    delivered at Saint Hills within the next 6
    weeks as we are right now super grooming the Super Power auditors
    in a special international course. It will
    be delivered in almost all languages.

    POWER PROCESSING. Grades V and VA are still available and being
    delivered at Saint Hills for persons
    who did not make Dianetic Clear, delivered only by Class VII
    auditors who are specialized on it. Power
    continues to produce its startling results.

    SUPER POWER. There is no reason a Dianetic Clear should be denied
    the powerful gains which research
    made available in '78 (see above). For the public who have gone
    Dianetic Clear, and those who haven't, Saint
    Hills will become a mecca where they obtain the most excellent
    results obtainable in Super Power.

    L. RON HUBBARD


    DEFINITIONS FOR SUPER POWER

    8 MAY 1994

    VIEWPOINT 1. a point of awareness from which one can perceive; a
    place from which one looks at
    something. 2. the place from which the individual is himself
    looking. 3. an attitude of mind; evaluation is the
    reactive mind's conception of viewpoint. The reactive mind does
    not perceive, it evaluates. To the analytical
    mind it may sometimes appear that the reactive mind has a
    viewpoint. The reactive mind does not have a
    viewpoint, it has an evaluation of viewpoint. Thus the viewpoint
    of the analytical mind is an actual point
    from which one perceives.

    Perception is done by sight, sound, smell, tactile, etc. The
    reactive mind's 'viewpoint' is an opinion based on
    another opinion and upon a very small amount of observation, and
    that observation would be formed out of
    uncertainties. Thus the confusion of the word viewpoint itself. It
    can be a point from which one can be
    aware, which is its analytical definition, and it can be
    somebody's ideas on a certain subject which is the
    reactive definition.

    FIND 1. to come upon; meet with; discover by chance. 2. to look
    for and get; to discover by searching. 3. to
    get sight of or knowledge of; to discover; learn. 4. to see; know;
    feel; perceive. 5. to get the use of; get. 6. to
    recover something lost. 7. to recover the use of.



    INTRODUCTION TO SUPER POWER
    Super Power Rundown Series 0

    5 MAY 1993

    The following is a list of materials which should make up a
    checksheet for students learning to apply the
    Super Power Rundown materials. This background material means it
    is vital to understand the full theory of
    the basics of restoring infinite powers to a being.

    SCIENTOLOGY 8
    SCIENTOLOGY 0 THE BOOK OF BASICS
    THE WHY IS GOD POLICY LETTER
    THE ORGANIZATION SERIES POLICY LETTERS
    THE PHOENIX LECTURES
    ETHICS AND JUSTICE POLICY LETTERS



    THE CONDITION BELOW CONFUSION
    Super Power Rundown Series 1
    5 MAY 1993

    The first action of beingness is to assume a viewpoint. Before one
    can know he is below confusion, he
    usually has to realize that he is in a condition of no-condition.

    Power is the ability to hold a position in space. The first action
    of creating space is to assume a point from
    which to view that space. When a viewpoint has been knocked around
    down through the time track by
    forces he believes have affected him, he tends to lose his ability
    to maintain a position in space.

    A being can assume the viewpoint of the first dynamic and attempt
    to take on all the other dynamics, which
    eventually overwhelms him. To get a being rehabilitated into the
    position of being able to operate at cause
    on all the dynamics, it is first necessary to get him into a
    condition of being.

    Therefore, the first action one takes in running the Super Power
    processes is to have the person find a
    viewpoint.

    The first command is: "Find a viewpoint."

    This is run to F/N Cog VGIs.

    Then one can run: "Find another's viewpoint," followed by: "Find a
    viewpoint that others are creating for
    others." The flow zero command is: "Find a viewpoint that you have
    created for yourself."

    A being can be so socked into the MEST universe that viewpoints
    have become solid objects. Viewpoints
    are points from which one views

    THE CONDITION BELOW CONFUSION

    universes. Solid objects are made up of matter, energy, space and
    time. Space is created by a viewpoint; a
    viewpoint can think the opposite.

    Many times you will find a person who is inverted on the dynamics
    to such an extent that he feel that MEST
    has created him rather than the other way around.

    This process will get the being into a position of being able to
    handle the condition below confusion and set
    him up for the next steps of the Super Power Rundown.



    8TH DYNAMIC PROCESSES

    Super Power Rundown Series 2
    5 MAY 1993

    This is an unlimited process. Usually you will find the person to
    be inverted on the dynamics. God is not an
    object. When one labels god with an identity one immediately
    degrades the 8th dynamic into MEST terms.
    The 8th dynamic cannot be defined in terms of MEST. It can only be
    defined in terms of infinity which the
    number 8 symbolizes.

    When running this process start with the 8th dynamic. Then run
    through the first up through the seventh
    and then stop. The purpose is to get the person to assume various
    viewpoints on all the dynamics at one
    level and then bring the person back to the 8th dynamic viewpoint.

    This process puts responsibility back into the person and sets him
    up for repair of all earlier actions which
    brought about a dwindling spiral away from the 8th dynamic
    viewpoint.

    This process is run even if the person goes exterior or has a big
    win. The only time you would end off the
    process is on a floating tone arm because obviously you cannot get
    any more reads on the meter.

    While running this process if any upsets, overts, missed withholds
    occur one simply cleans them up. On
    running OTs one would deal with any body thetans, clusters,
    entities and so forth as they show up.
    Remember to audit the person in front of you which means if
    someone else shows up you must audit them
    out, set them free before you can set the person in front of you,
    in the body, free.

    Here are the commands in order:

    1.Assume the viewpoint of the 8th dynamic.
    2.Get the idea of another assuming the viewpoint of the 8th
    dynamic.
    3.Get the idea of others assuming the viewpoint of the 8th
    dynamic.
    4.Get the idea of you causing yourself to assume the viewpoint
    of the 8th dynamic.

    5.Get the idea of your second dynamic assuming the viewpoint of
    the 8th dynamic.
    6.Get the idea of another second dynamic assuming the viewpoint
    of the 8th dynamic.
    7.Get the idea of other second dynamics assuming the viewpoint
    of the 8th dynamic.
    8.Get the idea of you causing all second dynamics to assume the
    viewpoint of the 8th dynamic.

    9.Get the idea of your third dynamic assuming the viewpoint of
    the 8th dynamic.
    10.Get the idea of another third dynamic assuming the viewpoint
    of the 8th dynamic.
    11.Get the idea of other third dynamics assuming the viewpoint
    of the 8th dynamic.
    12.Get the idea of you causing all third dynamics to assume the
    viewpoint of the 8th dynamic.

    13.Get the idea of your fourth dynamic assuming the viewpoint of
    the 8th dynamic.
    14.Get the idea of another fourth dynamic assuming the viewpoint
    of the 8th dynamic.
    15.Get the idea of other fourth dynamics assuming the viewpoint
    of the 8th dynamic.
    16.Get the idea of you causing all fourth dynamics to assume the
    viewpoint of the 8th dynamic.

    17.Get the idea of your fifth dynamic assuming the viewpoint of
    the 8th dynamic.
    18.Get the idea of another fifth dynamic assuming the viewpoint
    of the 8th dynamic.
    19.Get the idea of other fifth dynamics assuming the viewpoint
    of the 8th dynamic.
    20.Get the idea of you causing all fifth dynamics to assume the
    viewpoint of the 8th dynamic.

    21.Get the idea of your sixth dynamic assuming the viewpoint of
    the 8th dynamic.
    22.Get the idea of another sixth dynamic assuming the viewpoint
    of the 8th dynamic.
    23.Get the idea of other sixth dynamics assuming the viewpoint
    of the 8th dynamic.
    24.Get the idea of you causing all sixth dynamics to assume the
    viewpoint of the 8th dynamic.

    25.Get the idea of your seventh dynamic assuming the viewpoint
    of the 8th dynamic.
    26.Get the idea of another seventh dynamic assuming the
    viewpoint of the 8th dynamic.
    27.Get the idea of other seventh dynamics assuming the viewpoint
    of the 8th dynamic.
    28.Get the idea of you causing all seventh dynamics to assume
    the viewpoint of the 8th dynamic.

    29.Get the idea of your eighth dynamic assuming the viewpoint of
    the 8th dynamic.
    30.Get the idea of another eighth dynamic assuming the viewpoint
    of the 8th dynamic.
    31.Get the idea of other eighth dynamics assuming the viewpoint
    of the 8th dynamic.
    32.Get the idea of you causing all eighth dynamics to assume the
    viewpoint of the 8th dynamic.

    At this point the person should be in very good shape, enough so
    that his earlier injustices on the track can
    be easily accessible from the various viewpoints of the dynamics.

    The next step is to do the Ethics Repair List as per Super Power
    Rundown Series 3.



    ETHICS REPAIR LIST

    Super Power Rundown Series 3

    7 MAY 1993

    The purpose of the Ethics Repair List is to return full power to a
    being by proofing him up against injustices,
    counter postulates, failed purposes, counter purposes and evil
    intentions across the dynamics.

    These questions are asked in an unlimited way. In other words it
    applies to the whole track and whatever the
    person comes up with you simply two way comm it earlier similar to
    EP This repair list is actually designed to
    set the person up to be able to do the actual super power process.
    It cleans up the whole track on the
    subjects of ethics and justice.

    Do not take up unreading questions This list of questions is
    assessed like a regular repair list except then
    when you get a read you stop and handle the question and its
    charge, then repeat the same question to
    ensure no further reads or charge and then carry on with assessing
    the list. The list does not have to be
    F/Ning through the whole list. Handle protest or false reads
    accordingly.

    1.Have you had a wrong intention?
    2.Has another had a wrong intention?
    3.Have others had wrong intentions?
    4.Have you caused yourself to have wrong intentions?

    5.Have you been given a wrong intention?
    6.Have you given another a wrong intention?
    7.Have others given others a wrong intention?
    8.Have you caused yourself to be given a wrong intention?

    9.Have you been given a wrong indication?
    10.Haveyou given another a wrong indication?
    11.Have others given others a wrong indication?
    12.Have you caused yourself to be given a wrong indication?

    13.Have you had a wrong postulate?
    14.Has another had a wrong postulate?
    15.Have others had wrong postulates?
    16.Have you caused yourself to have wrong postulates?

    17.Have you been given a wrong postulate?
    18.Have you given another a wrong postulate?
    19.Have others given others a wrong postulate?
    20.Have you caused yourself to be given a wrong postulate?

    21.Have you ever been in a wrong condition?
    22.Has another ever been in a wrong condition?
    23.Have others ever been in a wrong condition?
    24.Have you ever caused yourself to be in a wrong condition?

    25.Have you ever been assigned a wrong condition?
    26.Have you assigned another a wrong condition?
    27.Has another ever assigned another or others a wrong
    condition?
    28.Have you ever assigned yourself a wrong condition?

    29.Have you ever applied a wrong formula for a condition?
    30.Have you caused another to apply a wrong condition formula?
    31.Have others caused others to apply a wrong condition formula?
    32.Have you ever caused yourself to apply a wrong condition
    formula?

    33.Has anyone ever disagreed with you?
    34.Have you ever disagreed with someone?
    35.Have others disagreed with others?
    36.Have you caused yourself to be disagreeable?

    37.Has someone ever caused you to disagree with another?
    38.Have you ever caused anyone to disagree with someone else?
    39.Have others caused others to disagree with others?
    40.Have you caused yourself to disagree with yourself?

    41.Have you ever been punished for disagreeing with someone?
    42.Have you ever caused another to be punished for disagreeing
    with you?
    43.Have others caused others to be punished for disagreeing?
    44.Have you caused yourself to be punished for disagreeing?

    45.Have you ever been lied about?
    46.Have you ever lied about someone else?
    47.Have others lied about others?
    48.Have you lied to yourself about yourself?

    49.Has anyone ever said that you were bad?
    50.Have you ever said that anyone else was bad?
    51.Have others said bad things about others?
    52.Have you ever said bad things about yourself?

    53.Have you ever disagreed with society?
    54.Has society ever disagreed with you?
    55.Have others disagreed with society?
    56.Have you disagreed with yourself because of society?

    57.Have you ever counter postulated the intentions of a society?
    58.Has society ever counter postulated your intentions?
    59.Have others ever counter postulated the intentions of a
    societY?
    60.Have you counter postulated your intentions because of
    society?

    61.Have you ever disagreed with a spouse
    62.Have you ever caused another to disagree with a spouse?
    63.Have others caused others spouses to disagree with others?
    64.Have you caused yourself to disagree with a spouse?

    65.Has anyone ever caused you an injustice?
    66.Have you ever caused another an injustice?
    67.Have others ever caused others an injustice?
    68.Have you ever caused yourself an injustice?

    69.Have you ever been lied to?
    70.Have you ever lied to another?
    71.Have others lied to others?
    72.Have you lied to yourself about another?

    73.Have you lied to yourself about others?
    74.Have you lied to yourself about family?
    75.Have you lied to yourself about groups?
    76.Have you lied to yourself about mankind?

    77.Have you lied to yourself about the animal kingdom?
    78.Have you lied to yourself about the physical universe?
    79.Have you lied to yourself about spiritual beings?
    80.Have you lied to yourself about the supreme being?

    81.Have you ever agreed with someone verbally but disagreed
    mentally?
    82.Have you caused another to agree with someone verbally but
    disagree mentally?
    83.Have you caused others to agree with others verbally but
    disagree mentally?
    84.Have you caused yourself to agree with others verbally but
    disagree mentally?

    85.Have you ever been falsely accused?
    86.Have you ever falsely accused another?
    87.Have others falsely accused others?
    88.Have you ever caused yourself to be falsely accused?

    89.Have you ever been falsely imprisoned by another?
    90.Have you ever falsely imprisoned another?
    91.Have others ever caused others to be falsely imprisoned?
    92.Have you caused yourself to be imprisoned because of others?

    93.Have you ever been falsely imprisoned?
    94.Has another been falsely imprisoned?
    95.Have others been falsely imprisoned?
    96.Have you caused yourself to be falsely imprisoned?

    97.Have you ever been wrong?
    98.Has another ever been wrong?
    99.Have others ever been wrong?
    100.Have you caused yourself to be wrong?

    101.Have you ever been forced into something?
    102.Have you ever forced another into something?
    103.Have others forced others into something?
    104.Have you forced yourself into something?

    105.Have you ever been forced into a situation?
    106.Have you ever forced another into a situation?
    107.Have others forced others into a situation?
    108.Have you caused yourself to be forced into a situation?

    109.Have you ever been deceived?
    110.Have you ever deceived another?
    111.Have others ever deceived others?
    112.Have you caused yourself to be deceived?

    113.Have you ever been manipulated?
    114.Have you ever manipulated another?
    115.Have others ever manipulated others?
    116.Have you caused yourself to be manipulated?

    117.Have you ever been made to stay in a location you didn't want
    to be in?
    118.Have you ever caused another to stay in a location they
    didn't want to be in?
    119.Have others ever caused others to stay in a location they
    didn't want to be in?
    120.Have you ever caused yourself to stay in a location you
    didn't want to be in?

    121.Have you ever been made to move away from a location you
    wanted to stay in?
    122.Have you ever caused another to move away from a location
    they wanted to stay in?
    123.Have others ever caused others to move away from a location
    they wanted to stay in?
    124.Have you ever caused yourself to move away from a location
    you wanted to stay in?

    125.Have you ever been given a wrong purpose?
    126.Have you ever given another a wrong purpose?
    127.Have others ever given others a wrong purpose?
    128.Have you ever given yourself a wrong purpose?

    129.Have you ever had a false purpose
    130.Have you ever caused another to have a false purpose?
    131.Have others caused others to have a false purpose?
    132.Have you ever caused yourself to have a false purpose?

    133.Do you have a wrong purpose?
    134.Does another have a wrong purpose?
    135.Do others have wrong purposes?
    136.Are you causing yourself to have a wrong purpose?

    137.Do you have any counter purposes?
    138.Does another have any counter purposes?
    139.Do others have any counter purposes?
    140.Are you causing yourself any counter purposes?

    141.Have you ever been told you had a false purpose?
    142.Have you ever told another they had a false purpose?
    143.Have others told others they have had false purposes?
    144.Have you ever told yourself that you had a false purpose?

    145.Do you have a failed purpose?
    146.Does another have a failed purpose?
    147.Do others have a failed purpose?
    148.Have you caused yourself to have a failed purpose?

    149.Have you ever been told you had a failed purpose?
    150.Have you ever told another they had a failed purpose?
    151.Have others told others they have had failed purposes?
    152.Have you ever told yourself that you had a failed purpose?

    153.Are you evil?
    154.Is another evil?
    155.Are others evil?
    156.Are you causing yourself to be evil?

    157.Have you ever been told you are evil?
    158.Have you ever told another they were evil?
    159.Have others told others they are evil?
    160.Have you ever told yourself that you are evil?

    161.Has anyone ever made you do anything evil?
    162.Have you ever made anyone else do anything evil?
    163.Have others ever made others do anything evil?
    164.Have you ever made yourself do anything evil?

    165.Has anyone ever said that you did anything evil?
    166.Have you ever said anyone else did anything evil?
    167.Have others ever said others did anything evil?
    168.Have you ever made yourself say anything evil?

    169.Have you been wronged?
    170.Have you wronged another?
    171.Have others wronged others?
    172.Have you caused yourself to wronged?

    173.Have you been given an evil purpose?
    174.Have you given another an evil purpose?
    175.Have others given others evil purposes?
    176.Have you caused yourself to have an evil purpose?

    177.Have you ever been told you had an evil purpose?
    178.Have you ever told another they had an evil purpose?
    179.Have others told others they have had an evil purposes?
    180.Have you ever told yourself that you had an evil purpose?

    181.Have you ever done anything wrong?
    182.Has another ever done anything wrong?
    183.Have others ever done anything wrong?
    184.Have you ever caused yourself anything wrong?

    185.Is it wrong to be wrong?
    186.Is it wrong for another to be wrong?
    187.Is it wrong for others to be wrong?
    188.Is it wrong for you to cause yourself to be wrong?

    189.Is it wrong to be right?
    190.Is it wrong for another to be right?
    191.Is it wrong for others to be right?
    192.Is it wrong to cause yourself to be right?

    193.Have you ever been expelled from a group?
    194.Have you ever expelled another from a group?
    195.Have others ever expelled others from a group?
    196.Have you ever caused yourself to be expelled from a group?

    197.Have you ever been forced to leave a group?
    198.Have you ever forced another to leave a group?
    199.Have others ever forced others to leave a group?
    200.Have you ever forced yourself to leave a group?

    201.Has anything ever happened too fast for you?
    202.Have you ever caused anything to happen too fast?
    203.Have others caused anything to happen too fast?
    204.Have you caused yourself to have something happen too fast?

    205.Has anything ever happened too slow for you?
    206.Have you ever caused anything to happen too slow?
    207.Have others caused anything to happen too slow?
    208.Have you caused yourself to have something happen too slow?

    209.Have you ever been given an arbitrary?
    210.Have you ever given another an arbitrary?
    211.Have others ever given others an arbitrary?
    212.Have you caused yourself any arbitraries?

    213.Have you been given an absolute?
    214.Have you ever given another an absolute?
    215.Have others ever given others an absolute?
    216.Have you caused yourself any absolutes?

    217.Have you ever been given a false law?
    218.Have you ever given another a false law?
    219.Have others ever given others any false laws?
    220.Have you caused yourself any false laws?

    221.Have you forgotten anything?
    222.Have you caused another to forget anything?
    223.Have others caused others to forget anything?
    224.Have you caused yourself to forget anything?



    THE EIGHTH DYNAMIC VIEWPOINT
    Super Power Rundown Series 4
    7 MAY 1994

    After the person has completed the condition below confusion by
    finding viewpoints the eighth dynamic
    processes and the Ethics Repair List, one then has the person go
    back to the 8th dynamic process with the
    following commands:

    1.Get the idea of your 8th dynamic assuming the viewpoint of
    the 8th dynamic.
    2.Get the idea of another 8th dynamic assuming the viewpoint of
    the 8th dynamic.
    3.Get the idea of other 8th dynamics assuming the viewpoint of
    the 8th dynamic.
    4.Get the idea of you causing all 8th dynamics to assume the
    viewpoint of all 8th dynamics.

    This now expands the persons viewpoint immensely and sets the
    person up for the final processes on the
    Super Power Rundown.

    Remember to run each flow to F/N, Cog, VGIs. Only end the session
    in the event of a floating TA and for no
    other reason.



    THE FINAL PROCESS
    THE ACTUAL SUPER POWER PROCESS
    Super Power Rundown Series 5
    7 MAY 1993

    The final step of the Super Power Rundown is to give back to the
    person his full potential power as a being.
    All prior steps on the Super Power Rundown have been designed to
    get a person into a state wherein he is
    set up to regain his ability to handle infinite power. These
    processes are run just like any other process with
    full F/N, Cog VGIs as the EP If the person goes exterior continue
    to run the processes. If there is a dial wide
    F/N continue to run the process. The only time you would end off
    the process or the session is if the person
    has a persistent floating TA.

    At some point during the running of this series of processes the
    person will reach a state wherein they are
    speechless. They will laugh with wild abandon. Their TA will be
    floating! They will probably also be exterior
    and will be unable to communicate in words what they are
    experiencing. This is the end result of the Super
    Power Rundown. It is rare for this to occur prior to the running
    of the last flow of this series of processes,
    but if it occurs then acknowledge the win.

    One thing the auditor must not do is interrupt the person while in
    the middle of this major win or during the
    laughter. Otherwise it will invalidate the win. The auditor simply
    maintains his TRs and lets the person have
    his win. Do not end the session until the laughter stops as this
    will also tend to invalidate the person and
    his win.

    The laughter can go on for some time. Perhaps up to an hour. Be
    sure and just be there with the person during this win and not end the session until the laughter has subsided.

    The following is the last series of processes one runs on the Super Power Rundown:

    THE FINAL PROCESS - THE ACTUAL SUPER POWER PROCESS

    1.Get the idea that you have infinite power.
    2.Get the idea that another has infinite power.
    3.Get the idea that others have infinite power.
    4.Get the idea that you can cause yourself to have infinite power.
    5.Get the idea that you have been given infinite power.
    6.Get the idea that another has been given infinite power
    7.Get the idea that others have been given infinite power.
    8.Get the idea that you have caused yourself to be given infinite power.
    9.Get the idea that you can give another infinite power.
    10.Get the idea that others can give others infinite power.
    11.Get the idea that another can give you infinite power.
    12.Get the idea that you can cause yourself infinite power.
    13.Get the idea that you are infinite.
    14.Get the idea that another is infinite.
    15.Get the idea that others are infinite.
    16.Get the idea that you can cause yourself to be infinity.

    Make sure to run only the reading process and check for interest.
    Do not run any process on the person in which he is not interested.

    The end phenomenon for the Super Power Rundown is a being who has
    regained the super powers of infinity.
  9. themadhair Member

  10. Random guy Member

    Re: New Era Dianetics for Operating Thetans

    I think reading some of this this stuff during raids should cause some major entubulation. The "super power" in particular is possibly the most moronic thing I have seen!

    I read somewhere that all who have run the "Super power" has since blown. Can someone confirm this?
  11. Anonymous Member

    Re: New Era Dianetics for Operating Thetans

    when its up on wikileaks could someone post a link, I know I suck at getting stuff from there. please
  12. Marty Rugburn Member

    Re: New Era Dianetics for Operating Thetans

    "an attitude of mind; evaluation is the
    reactive mind's conception of viewpoint. The reactive mind does
    not perceive, it evaluates. To the analytical
    mind it may sometimes appear that the reactive mind has a
    viewpoint. The reactive mind does not have a
    viewpoint, it has an evaluation of viewpoint. Thus the viewpoint
    of the analytical mind is an actual point
    from which one perceives.

    Perception is done by sight, sound, smell, tactile, etc. The
    reactive mind's 'viewpoint' is an opinion based on
    another opinion and upon a very small amount of observation, and
    that observation would be formed out of
    uncertainties. Thus the confusion of the word viewpoint itself. It
    can be a point from which one can be
    aware, which is its analytical definition, and it can be
    somebody's ideas on a certain subject which is the
    reactive definition."

    My brain turned to mush when I tried to read the above. No wonder the "tech" messes up their heads. Again...how can any intelligent human believe this crock of shit?
  13. subrosa Member

    Re: New Era Dianetics for Operating Thetans

    "The effective auditor will quickly spot and handle via proper
    use of the thetan hand technique, which must be drilled to perfection
    for NOTs auditors, and SOLO auditors."

    LOLOLOL "thetan hand technique' and SOLO auditing!!!
  14. Re: New Era Dianetics for Operating Thetans

    Talk to the hand, 'cause the thetan ain't listening?
  15. Anonymous Member

    Re: New Era Dianetics for Operating Thetans

    mt938770181.jpg
  16. fisherman Member

    Re: New Era Dianetics for Operating Thetans

    Is LRH referring to Xenu, Diana Ross, or someone higher? :cool:

    fisherman
  17. lambear Member

    Re: New Era Dianetics for Operating Thetans

    Herro, did you have MUs when you studied WISE? or VMHB? Your replies sometimes are very out-tech and you should do retreads at your own expense and then also report to ethics for being so out-PR in the public as you claim to be a representative of Scientology by saying you're a Scientologist. Get your ethics IN!!
  18. themadhair Member

    Re: New Era Dianetics for Operating Thetans

    Why would it? Most scifags wouldn't have clue it was even tech.
  19. Frozen Thetan Member

    Re: New Era Dianetics for Operating Thetans


    [IMG]



    David Miscavige was ≈ 6-8 years old when some of these HCOBs were being published.
  20. Anonymous Member

    Re: New Era Dianetics for Operating Thetans

    NOTs were developed in the late 70s/early 80s. He was in his late teens/early 20s in the 1980s when these particular HCOBs were published. That's why there was confusion, because he was highly active around Hubbard in the 80s. That's why he's in charge today.
  21. Herro Member

    Re: New Era Dianetics for Operating Thetans

    All I did was point out that the ritual of Communion might also look silly or crazy to outsiders. But hey, you read whatever you want into my statement.
  22. Anonynamefag Member

    Re: New Era Dianetics for Operating Thetans

    You're reaching, Herro. I doubt anyone actually believes that the bread and wine is literally the flesh and blood of Christ. It is a representation, and is presented as such.

    However, the cockamamie diarrhea of the brain presented in NOTs is presented as cold, hard fact by the time a Scientologist is allowed to read them, hence why it is called "source". Hell, Hubbard could have said the moon was made out of Xenu's hardened semen, and Scientologists would have to believe it word for word or be considered 'out-ethics'.

    And before you start making more comparisons to the Catholic church (something that Scientologists have been doing since they were ever first criticized, I should add), "heresy" is hardly a crime anymore, and hasn't been one in centuries. In Scientology, however, it's RPF-able.
  23. themadhair Member

    Re: New Era Dianetics for Operating Thetans

    Holy shit. I agree with both Herro and Gerard Ryan, head pr scifag in Dublin.

    Gerard's leaflet on the topic:
    New Religious Movements.doc
  24. themadhair Member

    Re: New Era Dianetics for Operating Thetans

    Lrn2transubstantiation
  25. Anonymous Member

    Re: New Era Dianetics for Operating Thetans

    Rituals are unfairly compared when taken out of context. Some rituals are direct in meaning, others have multi-layered, interwoven, or historical, contexts. Some are simply superficial.

    A ritual, almost by definition, is an expression of meaning that cannot be easily put into language. You're comparison of two rituals, in two brief phrases, without elaborating the context in which they occur (or what it is you're really trying to say) is meaningless and merely flippant.
  26. A.Non Hubbard Member

    Re: New Era Dianetics for Operating Thetans

    No one except a small, tiny, negligible group of people known as "Catholics". They're only 1 billion strong.
  27. humphrey Member

    Re: New Era Dianetics for Operating Thetans

    LSD is an 'enlightening' indole hallucinogen, it produces very Taoist and singular felt insights, not generally arcane baroque delusional narratives like Hubbard published. Hubbard's stories resemble the fever-dream-like tropane hallucinations and are probably the result of anticholinergic side-effects from amphetamines
  28. Anonynamefag Member

    Re: New Era Dianetics for Operating Thetans

    I stand corrected. I looked up transubstantiation. That's... slightly disgusting, that they actually think they're drinking blood and eating flesh.

    Cocks, etc.
  29. Anonymous Member

    Re: New Era Dianetics for Operating Thetans

    True, but not until the Council of Trent in 1551. Prior to that the issue was in doubt. Through the centuries since, ardent Catholics have struggled and stumbled over the doctrine. And, the Eastern Church, has it's own history and traditions regarding the Eucharist.

    None of this defends or denies the doctrine, but it demonstrates how, time, tradition, doubt and ethnic differenence may comprise the mult-faceted complexity of a ritual with a long history.

    Ritual is rarely 'clear-clut' -- if it were, it wouldn't be ritual.
  30. Sponge Member

    Re: New Era Dianetics for Operating Thetans

    I concur. Fire up the bong and I'll go get the munchies.

  31. Re: New Era Dianetics for Operating Thetans

    Also this: Almost every Catholic Altar has a relic (Piece of a dead person's body who was a saint) embedded in it. The priest kisses the part of the altar that contains it, during every mass. Usually the relic is a bone fragment.

    As churches close, relics hidden in altars face an uncertain fate - The Boston Globe

    Herro makes a good point that it is much better to focus on the aspects of Scientology that are provably harmful and coercive than the beliefs. All religions appear to outsiders as strange. Christianity can be described as a Jewish Zombie Cannibal Cult (Because Jesus was a Jew who rose from the dead and invites us to eat his flesh so we too can be undead. Also it can be described as a cult because it is derived from Judaism, uses a lot of Judaic beliefs but is considered heretical to Jews. Google the theological definition of cult if you think I'm being harsh. The word 'cult' only took on the connotations it did AFTER the 70's and 80s in the USA.)
    I concur.

    BTW there is no proof that the bone fragments are the leftovers from a zombie cannibal feast. To my knowledge they only chow down on Jesus.
  32. Anonymous Member

    Re: New Era Dianetics for Operating Thetans

    The OT materials isn't the bad part, they're part of the rituals used to satisfy the greed of a few in the RTC. Making someone into a scientologist requires the PC to be striped of anything he has of monetary value. After that, their very minds and bodies are used as indentured property to the cult of greed.
  33. Herro Member

    Re: New Era Dianetics for Operating Thetans

    LSD is vastly more harmful to the mind and body than a lifetime of participation in scientology.
  34. Anonymous Member

    Re: New Era Dianetics for Operating Thetans

    Fortunately LSD wasn't harmful to LRH, as a result we have these entertaining OT writing. Unfortunately LRH still make a totalitarian organization in spite of his LSD trips. Helena is a tad bit old to be worrying about this. When is she going to retire?

    They cn copy, that is awesome. I with this technology could be used to feed the hungry.
  35. Random guy Member

    Re: New Era Dianetics for Operating Thetans

    That would depend on the amount and frequency, wouldn't it?
  36. Anonymous Member

    Re: New Era Dianetics for Operating Thetans

    Albert Hofmann was born in 1906. He took LSD for the first time in 1943. He was a lifelong advocate of the drug until he died at age 102 in 2008, completely sane.

    L. Ron Hubbard was born in 1911. The first hit of Dianetics was in 1950. He was a lifelong advocate of the practice until he died at age 74 in 1986, completely off his fucking rocker.
  37. DeathHamster Member

    Re: New Era Dianetics for Operating Thetans

    They are a bad part when they're used as a substitute for medical treatment. See the one that Keith Henson got sued for. (NOTS 34, I think.)
  38. Anonymous Member

    Re: New Era Dianetics for Operating Thetans

    That's enough 'conciousness raising'! Have these 'neds for snot' gotten to the wikki?

    This stuff needs to be distributed as widely as possible!
  39. themadhair Member

  40. HellRazor Member

    Re: New Era Dianetics for Operating Thetans

    I fucking LOL'd and sprayed coffee all over the screen.

Share This Page

Customize Theme Colors

Close

Choose a color via Color picker or click the predefined style names!

Primary Color :

Secondary Color :
Predefined Skins