Discussion in 'Media' started by Anonymous, May 8, 2011.
Oh my what's this
man the harpoons!
Give that man some Anon loving and CAEK!
Lovely - what a great man!
I'm not surprised but I am delighted with the global reverberations Lawrence Wright's New Yorker piece on Paul Haggis.
The WINS are coming in steady!
This is the french source article that the awesome OP english article references.
La scientologie dans le collimateur ("Scientology in the crosshairs"
Pour la première fois, des élus se sont opposés, hier place de la Victoire,
à la diffusion de tracts par l'association Non à la drogue, oui à la vie, affiliée au mouvement scientologue
(in French) Sudouest 8th May 2011
YSO SADFACE, SCIENTOLOGIE?
Very nice article. Here's the intro, but there is lots more. Here's that link again
This seems like Kind Of A Big Deal.
(Are there poli-Frogs lurking here??)
Wow! That's an article for my Narconon bin! (In which the world looks at the NN fraud and says GTFO!)
Ooooo, this is major win!
Sometimes the French get it right. ;-)
The article mentions the years of pressure that US diplomats have been placing on the French government to allow the Scientology enterprise to act freely.
WHAT IS UP WITH THAT?
Who in the US diplomatic service is supporting Scientology, and more importantly why?
Nice work! And I love that it's not just one politician at work, but several!
Even politicans that are aware of the crimes of scientology will often tap dance around the various rainbows and unicorns front groups for fear of seeming to be soft on drugs, human rights, happiness or whatever the fuck else.
It's so refreshing to see these guys tackling the "drug free marshalls" head on.
moar like this
hey! other mayors worldwide take notes and get a clue!
got caught up in this bullshit
wonder if that is his idiot mom next to him
^^^ THIS ^^^ is for all those who deny US government links to the criminal cult-scam of $cientology.
These are some of the same people who believe the official version of 9/11... so, not a complete surprise, that.
I have a question - currently, if one googles Narconon, the first 5 websites actually pertain to the CoS and promote the narconon programme. Narconon exposed comes up 6th or 7th. Is there any way to bump the sites critical of Narconon higher up?
I'm pretty sure that is considered low toned right? Can standing around out in public with your hands in your pockets be enough to be sent to ethics? Because when I see it, I see lack of enthusiasm, hiding, pretending not to be there, IDLE. you know?
that kid reminds of a kid that was used in one of the COS promo vids
That might depend where you are googling from.
Currently I get the wikipedia article in 2nd
www.narconon-exposed.org in 3rd
"Narconon Scam" in 7th
The wikipedia article appears in 3rd place
www.Narconon-exposed.org in 4th
another "Narconon Scam" critical link in 5th
the wikipedia article is in 2nd place with critical sites in 3rd,4th,6th,7th,10th places.
The bigger problem is when people in need google for drug rehab in the first instance, find narconon, are attracted to its wild claims and marketing b/s, and then don't google any further to independently verifiy any of the claims.
The facial features look very similar, and the age spread seems about right, so I'd say there's a good chance of that.
Choose a color via Color picker or click the predefined style names!