Operation Titstorm

Discussion in 'Freedom of Expression' started by urbanhawk, Feb 5, 2010.

  1. urbanhawk Member

    Re: Operation Titstorm

    Well i found this on the IRC for the DDoS attack. Someone on there said that it is a copy of the Australian Black List, there is no way to confirm if it is true but figure that I'd put it on here anyway.
  2. Anonymous Member

    Re: Operation Titstorm

    seems likely. a few of the chans are listed, as well as some wikipedia pages it seems. plus hundreds of pornographic sites.
  3. Anonymous Member

    Re: Operation Titstorm

  4. urbanhawk Member

    Re: Operation Titstorm

    Right now they are focused on this site and they have been nailing it awhile:

    the main page loads fine for whatever the reason but everything else on the site can't be accessed.
  5. fisherman Member

  6. Anonymous Member

    Re: Operation Titstorm

    Someone did predict that any censor needs to publish a list of banned sites which immediately becomes most desirable reading for everyone interested.

    And here it is.
  7. Anonymous Member

    Re: Operation Titstorm

  8. Herro Member

    Re: Operation Titstorm

    Wait, so you engaged in illegal activities against a government, and then wrote about what you did and how you did it on a publicly viewable website? Going for camera's title of biggest dumbass on wwp are we? :D
  9. Anonymous Member

  10. urbanhawk Member

    Re: Operation Titstorm

    He never said that he actually engaged in an illegal activity, he simply said that he made a tool to carry it out. There is a difference between having the potential to carry an act out and actually doing it.
  11. Anonymous Member

    Re: Operation Titstorm

    voiceless849, please learn what DDoS is before failing quite so badly again.

    As for the Austrialian Government...

    Code: union all select null,null,null,4,null,null from speeches--
    They should learn how to sanitize SQL before they try and blacklist the internet :rolleyes:

    (Yes, I know, its blind - but I only had 5 minutes to spare)
  12. Anonymous Member

    Re: Operation Titstorm

  13. urbanhawk Member

  14. Anonymous Member

    Re: Operation Titstorm


  15. Anonymous Member

    Re: Operation Titstorm

    They killed Basementdad. YOU BASTARDS ! :mad:
  16. Anonymous Member

    Re: Operation Titstorm

    Time for this.
  17. fisherman Member

    Re: Operation Titstorm

    What's the source of the pastebin list? Does the pastebin list really reflect what is expected to be censored? Yes, there's a lot of smut here, but there's quite a few mistakes. Many are just search engine results drawn from supposedly provocative word associations. This one offers real stuff for kids:

    I'm 100% free speech and open internet, but having raised children I can strongly relate to the concerns many have. I've seen things I wished were unreachable or unavailable. But then, who decides? Me? No. Government censorship is tyranny, plain and simple. And there's a big difference between regulating something and banning it. That's why we have a first amendment. Filtering the internet is not regulating, it's banishment and your free speech and mine could too easily get caught in a government's filters.

    Comedian Lenny Bruce posed the question, "Who gets to decide who's suspicious? Because you look pretty suspicious to me! I look pretty suspicious to you."
  18. JohnB2008 Member

    Re: Operation Titstorm

    the pastebin thing is from wikileaks, no?
  19. Re: Operation Titstorm

  20. Re: Operation Titstorm

    wow that is powerfull stuf

  21. urbanhawk Member

    Re: Operation Titstorm

    K guys i found this article online about this which i deem as a must see. The real intriguing stuff starts around halfway though the article about people wanting to force internet users to require government licenses before going online. The video on the site is pretty good.

    Internet Censorship Protest Shuts Down Australian Government Websites

    If that ever happens we will probably just set up a darknet and operate from there
  22. Skeptic1337 Member

    Re: Operation Titstorm

    Are you currently using vpns, tunnels, proxies, ip spoofing tools to make this post while jacking into some one elses network to originate?

    Or are you posting from an account which is either MAC authorizing or user/pwd authorizing to a network.

    Because if it's the latter you're fucking retarded and deserve to be assraped by the men in grey suits.
  23. RedOrbifold Member

    Re: Operation Titstorm

    radio based internet! sure it'll be slower than dial up, but it's a method
  24. Skeptic1337 Member

    Re: Operation Titstorm

    Already exists. low frequency web surfing, it's like being on a 2600 baud modem.

  25. urbanhawk Member

    Re: Operation Titstorm

    The problem with that though is that it is too slow and will eventually restrict the flow of information just by it's lack of speed alone. We would need something with speeds equivalent to the internet but without any hope of being censored. Therefore the only sensible thing to do would be to create a second parallel network to the already existing internet which couldn't be controlled. Creating a darknet could even help out with our efforts in iran at bypassing internet censorship as well as in china (and australia at this rate).

    The attack is still going strong
  26. Re: Operation Titstorm

  27. Skeptic1337 Member

    Re: Operation Titstorm

    You're just trading one regulator for another. The sheer nature of how networks work means that some one can control it. Even if means that control = shutting it down.

    You'd need some one much smarter then me (shouldn't be too hard) to come up with networking concepts where the "client/server" identification (ie mutating IP) only exists for as long as it's needed. Basically a GET has a unique routing table for that specific GET. Lots of flaws with that concept but something akin to that. Do the same for the "server" or destination IP and a way to negate filters and we'd be talking. Setting up internet v2.0 with the same bones only accomplishes trading in one set of fagmasters for another.
  28. Anonymous Member

    Re: Operation Titstorm

  29. Anonymous Member

    Re: Operation Titstorm

    mine are 34B. banned in australia? y/n
  30. Anonymous Member

    Re: Operation Titstorm

    post pics and we'll judge
  31. Anonymous Member

    Re: Operation Titstorm

    I wonder if an ISP selling something analogous to pre-paid phone cards might preserve anonymity.

    Nuther idea: user cooperatives behind a proxy. Outsiders trace activity to the co-op but not to any individual. The co-op dumps client-server logs daily.
  32. Anonymous Member

    Re: Operation Titstorm

    the censorship list was put on wikileaks ages ago, leaked by one of the companies the govt gave the list to. It had a whole lot of porn on it, but also anti-abortion sites, euthanasia sites, and some random dentist from Queensland, amongst other curiosities. As Google noted, the "Refused Classification" category is very broad.

    IMHO the DDoS is a retarded exercise in giving them exactly what they want. It will only make Conroy's cock harder.
  33. Anonymous Member

    Re: Operation Titstorm


    Site back up- O:TS is fini?
  34. AnonyVix Member

    Re: Operation Titstorm

    Agreed. The idea that DDoS are terrorism is ridiculous, they are acts of civil disobedience much akin to the kinds of acts Gandhi committed in protest. I do not condone the illegal but nor do I condone the Australian Government's actions in this matter.
  35. Anonymous Member

    Re: Operation Titstorm

    I've no idea of the technical obstacles, but the only way I see this working is if the majority of co-op members are motivated and involved enough to keep leaderfags/egofags out, and rotate leadership properly. Otherwise you're just trading a boardroom tyrant for some other potential douchbag.
  36. urbanhawk Member

    Re: Operation Titstorm

    No it is not finished the attack is still going on. They switched targets
  37. xenubarb Member

    Re: Operation Titstorm

    I have to say, the ignorance of these men makes me not want anything to do with them.
    Female ejaculation is URINE?

    O RLY?

    Let's see...urine leaves the body via the bladder and urethra. Poo comes out your butt.

    With me so far?

    Vaginas are part of a whole separate system. They are not connected to the bladder and so have no access to urine.

    This is as dumb as saying puke is urine, or earwax is poo. I feel sorry for these guys' wives. How can these grown men be so butt-ignernt?
  38. Anonymous Member

    Re: Operation Titstorm

  39. lingling Member

    Re: Operation Titstorm

    Idea. Getting organized feminist groups onboard as another front. Stay with me for a sec. :D

    This move by the censors highlights the true misogyny in their current government. The censorship laws against pron are merely a backdoor for normalizing laws to govern women’s sexuality irl.

    Female ejaculate - In attempting to present women as tools for men’s pleasure, who have no needs of their own, the govt is setting a precedence that will trickle down into the nation’s bedrooms. When the government attempts to criminalize female pleasure, is the chastity belt far behind?

    Little tits – This move blames small-breasted women for pedophilia which is more often a crime committed by males. The logical consequence is that women over 18 will be required to have breast enlargement, or face being charged with encouraging pedophilia.

    tl;dr – The Australian govt believes women should be full of silicon and have no physical pleasure of their own, and they're creating discriminatory laws to make that happen. Burn your bra and join the million-woman small-tittied nekkid-march on parliament!
  40. urbanhawk Member

Share This Page

Customize Theme Colors


Choose a color via Color picker or click the predefined style names!

Primary Color :

Secondary Color :
Predefined Skins