Customize

San Jose Fliers are OUT

Discussion in 'Leaks & Legal' started by The Goddamn Pacman, Feb 13, 2010.

  1. Anonymous Member

    Re: San Jose Fliers are OUT

    None of my media poons landed. Poop. I tried, guise.
  2. Re: San Jose Fliers are OUT

    Full tl;dr of thread to date. I hope you appreciate it. I was rickrolled.

    As at 28 Feb 2010, no mediation has occurred between local Anons and Delorme McKee Stoval. There has been only one press article. No FOIA requests have been returned. No action of any sort has been taken. Delorme does not acknowledge that the flyer is an issue. Press harpoons are not hitting.

    FACTS
    Delorme is paid $71,174.28
    In 2 years Delorme’s ‘Network’ has made 1 radio commercial, report and 2 flyers (actually the same flyer rehashed). In 2006, Scientology sued The County. Now the county is doing their work for them. The flyers appear to have been distributed by Scientologists.

    Full RTF thread summary here
  3. BigBeard Member

    Re: San Jose Fliers are OUT

    FOIA requests take time. And the four Ex's got some positive feed back after their remarks at the BofS meeting, and hopefully got the BofS's attention.

    The next BofS meeting is Tuesday, March 2nd, with another March 23rd. One can hope their will be follow up to get the situation on the official Agenda so their can be public two-way discussion with the board on the issue in the future.

    BigBeard
  4. tikk Member

  5. EyeOnSci Member

  6. whoever Member

    Re: San Jose Fliers are OUT

    Thanks, Tikk.

    Btw, looks like there is an editing glitch (something that doesn't seem to belong):
  7. Re: San Jose Fliers are OUT

    I agree completely. This will take time. I just spent 4 hours reading the thread to get the current status and I kept reading requests for tl;drs. So I did one. No offense intended.
  8. Anonymous Member

    16 Threads in One

    Fliers???
  9. Anonymous Member

  10. Anonymous Member

    Re: San Jose Fliers are OUT

    Any follow up from the county (excluding D.)?
  11. Re: San Jose Fliers are OUT

    None yet; at least one of us will be at the BoS meeting tomorrow to re-address the issue in front of the county.
  12. JustSomeWoman Member

    Re: San Jose Fliers are OUT

    What does it take to get this on the BOS agenda so that it can be fully fleshed out with the BOS? Is there an at-large supervisor if the supervisor representing Santa Clara is not interested?

    Every real estate developer in the County can get face time with supervisors/staffs, why not the affected Anons?
  13. Rockyj Member

    Re: San Jose Fliers are OUT

    Amazing work! My first thought was that the San Jose Anon's had some sort of case against the county and/or Delorme!
  14. Anonymous Member

    Re: San Jose Fliers are OUT


    Thanks for applying your skills yet again. Great stuff.

    Also go go Board Addressing Anons.
  15. Herro Member

    Re: San Jose Fliers are OUT

    Round two eh? I'd like to repost my thoughts.

    Obviously that's designed with four people with a minute each to speak in mind. But one person could easily do something similar to the first part.
  16. Anonymous Member

    Re: San Jose Fliers are OUT

    ^ Herro, you must have done well in debating club in highschool. No sarcasm intended.
  17. 3rdMan Member

    Re: San Jose Fliers are OUT

    Pacman, this is the prime example for a clear and concise speech of the main issue.
  18. adhocrat Member

    Re: San Jose Fliers are OUT

    I agree, but that's the first I'd seen it

    Oh well

    Good job herro

    and 3rdman thanks for your help.
  19. Herro Member

    Re: San Jose Fliers are OUT

    Thanks. Shame it got domed last week since the guy speaking before the BOS found it helpful. Ah well, such is life for a shitposter.

    Also, for what it's worth, I thought your presentation was fine, I was just critiquing the effectiveness of the content.
  20. Ann O'Nymous Member

    Re: San Jose Fliers are OUT

    Learn to troll...
  21. Re: San Jose Fliers are OUT

    Ron White also:

  22. Anonymous Member

    Re: San Jose Fliers are OUT

    Someone in the DA's office is looking into the truthiness of what was printed on the county's dime.

    Officer Frank Domingues
    70 West Hedding, suite 100
    San Jose
    1-408-299-7400

    If you have comments, you know what to do
  23. skeptic2girl Member

    I think mongrel's right about anyone committing to crimes and calling themselves "anonymous" actually IS anonymous, but it seems pretty clear the cult is referring to people wearing GFs masks and holding signs in front of an org.
  24. Anonymous Member

    Bump!
  25. Anonymous Member

    That post is over a year old.
  26. Anonymous Member

  27. moarxenu Member

Share This Page

Customize Theme Colors

Close

Choose a color via Color picker or click the predefined style names!

Primary Color :

Secondary Color :
Predefined Skins