Customize

That's it. Ollie has gone too far; Time for Salvo Two.

Discussion in 'Youtube and Vimeo Problems' started by Anonynamefag, Oct 8, 2008.

  1. Anonynamefag Member

    Re: That's it. Ollie has gone too far; Time for Salvo Two.

    EVERYONE.
    If you get a video DMCA'd and it uses either Oschaper's name or his company's name, TAKE A SCREENSHOT OF IT, and sign an affidavit that it was NOT edited in any way, shape, or form.

    We need SOLID FUCKING PROOF.
  2. 0815 Member

    Re: That's it. Ollie has gone too far; Time for Salvo Two.


    You don't get it?

    TOS - TERMS OF SERVICE aka JewTube removes content is seems to violate their rules - NO GO FOR US.

    DMCA - Ollie claims it and takes it down. You need to file a counter DMCA claim and take him to court.


    I don't see what Berry can do for us if he is in bed with JewTube?
  3. anon0004 Member

    Re: That's it. Ollie has gone too far; Time for Salvo Two.

    no I did not get it, but thanks for slapping it onto my head, this helps sometimes.

    also to be not completely stoopid
    take him to court, is what Berry could do, isn´t it?
  4. iaxiloll Member

    Re: That's it. Ollie has gone too far; Time for Salvo Two.

    I mentioned this earlier, it seems to me the only logical way to go, post clips that does not violate shit only Ollie´s ego.
  5. Anonynamefag Member

    Re: That's it. Ollie has gone too far; Time for Salvo Two.

    I don't mean to shit on the parade, but I see a problem with a lolsuit, though.
    Anonymous is NOT an established entity, in the sense of a business, club, etc. Therefore, we can't collectively sue Ollie as "Anonymous".

    So, what CAN we do?
  6. 0815 Member

    Re: That's it. Ollie has gone too far; Time for Salvo Two.


    I don't like to spoil or piss on your plate but if he is as rational as QAnon stated before, Ollie will work this without emotions (like a Scilon) and he will not even care. All he has done is to piss us off and he seems to understand how JewTube operates and what we legally can or can't do.
    Even if we want to take him to court, we will need to show our counter DMCA claims which nobody filed with the exception of QAnon. So we have no legal ground. On the other hand, it can be tricky for any other Anon to explain why we consider him a CP paddler and why any judge would agree with us. Damages? What can we claim? Broken ego on our site? If we claim commercial loss or damages, we are in violation of JewTube's TOS.

    Berry and EFF can investigate but what can they do? I'm afraid that they can't do much for our cause as long Ollie plays by the rules. We getting fucked because we can't really proof shit. We don't really know what he owns or can claim and all our assumptions will not solve this issue.

    I would love to post his neighborhood with flyers but I'm short on funding at the moment.
  7. LilDebbie Member

    Re: That's it. Ollie has gone too far; Time for Salvo Two.

    uh, doesn't yt keep records of all dmca takedown notices? aren't they required to do so by law? can't Q file suit on an affidavit that takedown notices were issued and then subpoena google for the logs? this is the internet people. everything gets written down.

    also, false dmca claims are perjury, e.g. a criminal matter. damages don't apply.
  8. 0815 Member

    Re: That's it. Ollie has gone too far; Time for Salvo Two.

    But can we solid proof that this bastard has no copyright? Ollie was willing to take QAnon down to court and you don't start with a legal case if you can't win it. I'm not so sure if we're on the safe site. Plus chances are high that Shadows claim Ollie paddles CP would backfire at QAnon because he would be responsible for the content as publisher.
    I know Ollie pisses on our playground but we made him what he is by providing him with more attention as necessary. This little attention whore should be dealt with by a swift and sweet B-OP, one that he will never forget.
  9. Lorelei Member

    Re: That's it. Ollie has gone too far; Time for Salvo Two.

    I think that what some Anons are doing is clever. Look at this video: YouTube - The rant of You know Who (CENSORED)

    Quick link: watch?v=qSU1eadrFSc

    Now look at the Related Videos section. There are about ten removed via DMCA anti-oschaper videos. Each video title and selected screenshot remains.

    Do you see where this is going?

    Step One: Make a YT account (using a proxy?) with an ID image expressing your annoyance and a catchy screenname, then Friend as many fellow anons and non-anons as you can. Expect this channel to get DMCA'd; that is of no relevance. The avatar MIGHT get challenged as well. The RELEVANCE is that those account names and (unchallenged) account avatars remain on Friends Lists forever.

    Step Two: Upload videos containing only his picture, of any duration. Go crazy, make a LULZY shoop. Your video can be 0:01 long, if you want. Pick a catchy title. Punch up your video comments section and tags. Expect that it will get DMCA'd; that is of no relevance. The RELEVANCE is that those titles and screenshots remain on YT forever, even if they aren't linked.

    Step Three: While waiting for the inevitable impotent DMCA claims, comment on as many videos as you can with your snazzy new screenname. Write a 400-characters-or-fewer comment detailing why oschaper / 4getxenu / ARCwins suck balls and are abusing YT with fraudulent DMCA claims out of butthurt. Share your opinion where other YT users might care. Whether or not your account gets deleted is of no relevance. The RELEVANCE is--you guessed it--comments stay on YT forever unless the video owner / channel owner deletes them.

    Step Four: Lather, rinse, repeat.

    Step Five: ? ? ? ?

    Step Six: PROFIT!

    In the meantime, folks re-upping the longer original videos can continue to do that, knowing they'll get DMCA'd, but it keeps oschaper very busy being a YT troll. And those video images and titles are there forever.

    What say you, Anon?
  10. 0815 Member

    Re: That's it. Ollie has gone too far; Time for Salvo Two.


    Simple problem: DMCA and TOS. You know that all the videos that Shadow uploaded have been removed due to TOS.

    Ollie only DMCA'd images with his image.
  11. me57 Member

    Re: That's it. Ollie has gone too far; Time for Salvo Two.

    good idea keep ollie=the loser busy he will eventually tire and quit
  12. 0815 Member

    Re: That's it. Ollie has gone too far; Time for Salvo Two.

    We have been hoping this for quite some time. Fuck him and lets get back on target.
  13. The Shadow Member

    Re: That's it. Ollie has gone too far; Time for Salvo Two.

    Hmmmm

    Just got back to find all of the Schaper videos removed due to TOS (all the Downfall parody ones are still up. Never mind, I'll sort something out for the next wave =D

    Meanwhile, Ollie has fucked up. He DID remove one of my videos with his photo removed and replaced with the Paint picture of him using DMCA, NOT TOS. No infringement, therefore he can be done for false DCMA. I still have the email from YT, the link, and THANK GOD I left it on my account (I'm staring at it now, 'Rejected- copyright infringement').

    I am willing to take any legal steps I can, as long as I can do so without namefagging myself. OK, so at some point in my Anonymoius career I will be namefagged, but I'm not doing it myself and not over this cunt.

    The Shadows's suggested next plan of attack:

    Why not drop Tustin City Council an email (City of Tustin, CA :: City Council) and let them know about the pervert in their city? Be sure to hint at CP, oh and BTW can I just say, going by what Qanon said about Ollie 'panicking' when I suggested he had a CP connection, I reckon that's proof of guilt. If someone suggested I had CP, if I knew 100% that I was clean and that I had nothing to hide, I wouldn't 'panic'. DO I think his company is making it? No, but I'd bet money that he likes it, has his own stash etc.
  14. me57 Member

    Re: That's it. Ollie has gone too far; Time for Salvo Two.

    wow great sounds like You got him. ollie you=loser
  15. 0815 Member

    Re: That's it. Ollie has gone too far; Time for Salvo Two.

    How long to you think they will stay? I followed your uploads and the stats on the videos were as low as the ones from your local ORG.

    Unless you file a counter DMCA claim you have nothing. If you don't claim your copyright, you acknowledge his removal request. In addition are you sure that he DMCA'd this video? All the other videos with the painted picture received TOS notices. Guess you are on his good side. Regardless, he can always claim an accidental removal (that is why you need to claim it) and within the 9th circuit he would not even get a $1 fine. But he would have you for defamation of character. He might loose the DMCA and turns around fucks you hardcore with another lawsuit which you loose. Sorry, but this will not work.

    There is nothing you can do. Without namefagging there is nothing you can do. But you should consider other legal claims he can bring against you which could be very costly. You would also contest your claim in person in the U.S. and that could be dangerous for you because you never know what the cult is willing to do.


    Than stop complaining, make a new video and upload it on JewTube.


    [/quote]The Shadows's suggested next plan of attack:

    Why not drop Tustin City Council an email (City of Tustin, CA :: City Council) and let them know about the pervert in their city? Be sure to hint at CP, oh and BTW can I just say, going by what Qanon said about Ollie 'panicking' when I suggested he had a CP connection, I reckon that's proof of guilt. If someone suggested I had CP, if I knew 100% that I was clean and that I had nothing to hide, I wouldn't 'panic'. DO I think his company is making it? No, but I'd bet money that he likes it, has his own stash etc.[/QUOTE]

    Again, not a good move if you ever like to win against him legally. You don't think and if he is as QAnon described, rational and planing that he will be well aware of his steps and considers all actions. Do you really think that Ollie would be so stupid to risk jail for CP? (I HOPE HE IS BUT I GUESS THAT WOULD BE WISHFUL THINKING)

    Be smart and try to think before you make a move because all you have done is to produce a video that could backfire at you. No Anon would take the heat for you because nobody would be stupid enough to go to court on your behalf and face potential defamation of character claims, and calling somebody a CP peddler in public without evidence would not win you the jury.
  16. 0815 Member

    Re: That's it. Ollie has gone too far; Time for Salvo Two.

    Shadow got nothing unless he files a counter DMCA claim. You guys don't think and act like children. If we deal with a professional buttfuck like Ollie, we need to be able to control the game but at this point in time, we run after him like little girls and cry foul.

    No DMCA counter-claims = waste of time or no claim.

    Unless you provide full evidence that you can contest he claim, there is nothing we can do. No court would put him in jail and destroy the key unless we have SOLID EVIDENCE, DO OUR DUE DILIGENCE and CREATE DOCUMENTATION.
  17. Anonypeg Member

    Re: That's it. Ollie has gone too far; Time for Salvo Two.

    Then we can't do anything. All we can do is wait to see if Eva Galperin or Graham Berry find a way to change the system of DMCAing or do so in such a way that we retain our anonymity. Ollie has perjured himself when he's taken down videos, but the only true form of documentation we can rely on are e-mail notifications from youtube (which sends you the link in question and who claimed the copyright ... which is partially useless because one cannot view a suspended video), or youtube providing the evidence themselves (through records and stuff).

    There's nothing we can do to satisfy the "DO IT NAO" mentality unless some discovery is made from the EFF or Graham. I'm also going to wait until QAnon gets his account back.
    If you have any suggestions on what we can do and/or what you want us to do, please say so. As far as I can see, nothing can be done at this point in time.
  18. 0815 Member

    Re: That's it. Ollie has gone too far; Time for Salvo Two.

    I full agree with you. Our problem is that we don't know for sure if Ollie perjured himself because we have not forced him to provide evidence of his claim. JewTube emails are not worth anything because unless you file a claim, this claim gets resolved in court there is nothing. The EFF and Graham can't do much but complain about it because if we can't start the initial steps we better stop crying and man-up. Do we suck cock or are we Anons?

    But I think it is more alarming that Ollie got JewTube in his hands and they remove the content for him. TOS is nothing we can fight because JewTube will be able to allow or remove any content is feels inappropriate.
  19. Anonypeg Member

    Re: That's it. Ollie has gone too far; Time for Salvo Two.

    I know for certain that Ollie perjured himself when he took down two of my videos on behalf of Media House Enterprises (even though the copyrights belonged to Canadian channels CBC and CTV), but now that those videos are restored and oschaper and 4getXenu banned, I'm not sure if that past case plays a role anymore. There is no gray area as far as this case of taking down news articles is concerned, but there is a gray unknown area as far as him claiming copyright to a pic he made public in the first place.

    What I believe the EFF can do is investigate Ollie themselves and the claims he's made, and bring it up with youtube, perhaps change the system in how copyright infringement claims are made. What I believe Graham can do is compile evidence to use against Ollie and possibly out him for perjury and knowing full well he committed it.

    Regarding the initial steps, what did you have in mind? Namefagging ourselves by filing counterclaims? We can't do anything at this point in time, ala "DO IT NAO", but if we can, I'd like to hear your suggestion. I'm personally going to wait it out unless I hear a great ideas as an initial step. Ollie has become benign anyway.
  20. 0815 Member

    Re: That's it. Ollie has gone too far; Time for Salvo Two.

    See and we might be wrong with the assumption that he has no copyright claim. Let me play the bastards (the devil would be defamed if used to describe Ollie) advocate and state his rights have been violated. We can't do shit about it because A.) nobody filed a DMCA and B.) videos are back and C.) CBC and CTV both own the content and could start to enforce their rights on YouTube if too much attention forces them due to legal rights issues.


    That is odd because Ollie closed his account before the take-downs and I'm not sure but JewTube might just waved a white flag and noted his account to peace the masses.


    That is not correct because any piece of material broadcasters air touches rights. I started to read a bunch of material about the topic because I would love to understand how we can fuck Ollie so hard that he never recovers. I have found so many loop-holes that this looks more like a swiss cheese.

    And that is it. The EFF is a private foundation with no legal authority. They can investigate all day long and still produce no conviction.


    Again, in order to do this we need Anons that counter claim. As long we have nobody available, there is nothing we or Graham can do. He would need this claim to base his allegations against Ollie.


    We're are stuck and regardless what we do, he is a step ahead of us at the moment. Unless we find some fall-guy that is willing to face a defamation lawsuit (something Ollie would probably consider) we have nothing on hand.
    I would move into black-ops and see if we can digg up some dirt on this ass nao. Make his life a nightmare and report everything we can find. Why should we limit our attention just on the DMCA issues. Everything goes and he is fair game.


    [/quote]I'm personally going to wait it out unless I hear a great ideas as an initial step. Ollie has become benign anyway.[/QUOTE]

    We need to put him down and make him aware that WE RULE THE INTERNETS.
  21. Re: That's it. Ollie has gone too far; Time for Salvo Two.

    So the only thing that can stop Anon from vanning Oschaper is the fact that any anon would have to use his name and get fair game'd?

    I am a bit confused as to what is going on.
    I would be willing to get namefagged if Oshapher would definitly get v&.
    unless if I was sued or counter-sued, or something.
  22. The Shadow Member

    Re: That's it. Ollie has gone too far; Time for Salvo Two.

    Okay, I'm currently re-editing the video and censoring it. I am blanking out his Surname, obviously, but I need some advice on what level of identification I can get away with.

    Can I still refer to 'Oschaper' as a username?

    Can I still leave in the names of the companies he runs, or is that too identifiable?
  23. 0815 Member

    Re: That's it. Ollie has gone too far; Time for Salvo Two.


    You can bet your ass that Ollie would counter-sue. Your DMCA counter-claim may also fall. If you have something of value to loose, you should think twice. If you're broke and have nothing, and expect nothing in life go ahead.
  24. 0815 Member

    Re: That's it. Ollie has gone too far; Time for Salvo Two.

    I know you would like to make a name for yourself but you should clam down a bit and stay low for a while. You could piss this guy off that he decides to go after other accounts and starts to remove Anon videos via TOS. We can't legally fight any TOS removal. You should start to think before you act because you put yourself on the line. Don't count on us to rescue you if Ollie get a hold of you and as more you push, as more motivation will you provide for him.
  25. Anonynamefag Member

    Re: That's it. Ollie has gone too far; Time for Salvo Two.

    Regardless, we should STILL compile evidence.
  26. 0815 Member

    Re: That's it. Ollie has gone too far; Time for Salvo Two.

    I agree but there is no evidence that can be used in court. No counter DMCA filings = no evidence we can use in court.
  27. Re: That's it. Ollie has gone too far; Time for Salvo Two.

    So we are pretty much screwed because we do not have the dox to solve this all?..

    How much damage is this bastard doing to us? a couple vids a day cant be harming us that much, besides, he is claiming to have never attacked anti-scientology videos, so if he were to attack an anti-scientology video at this time.. we would definitly get proof of this and be able to attack him legally with it, ending him the wit a footbullet, or am I wrong?

    I think the only thing he has been attacking in a while, is videos having to do with himself.
    I could be dead-wrong though.
  28. 0815 Member

    Re: That's it. Ollie has gone too far; Time for Salvo Two.

    You're correct about your assumption. We have shit and no judge would fuck Ollie at this point. Even if he goes for all anti-Scientology videos on JewTube, we have nothing unless we file DMCA counter-claims. But I'm moar worried about the resent TOS removals because Ollie can't be held liable for them. He must have found a way to have JewTube do the dirty work for him.
    Unless we have massive dox against him, no court will ever rule against him. All we can do is to fuck him in public and I hope my X-mas wish will come true.
  29. Anonynamefag Member

    Re: That's it. Ollie has gone too far; Time for Salvo Two.

    Hmmm... this gives me an idea.

    Does anyone know for sure that he MAKES pornography, not just broadcasting it? Because if he does, then I'm sure any neighbor that lives near him (especially those with kids) would like to know they live next to a porn peddler. :D
  30. iaxiloll Member

    Re: That's it. Ollie has gone too far; Time for Salvo Two.

    I have a nagging feeling that if he wins this round he will step things up a notch or two. How much power does he have beyond the borders of the U.S.? I for example, was willing to get name fagged outside the U.S., what steps could we take to stop him from taking down clips from "my" channel and can we use it as a president to stop him fro removing clips from "my" channel, then others?
  31. Anonynamefag Member

    Re: That's it. Ollie has gone too far; Time for Salvo Two.

    Shit. I didn't think of that.
    *cue QAnon*
  32. 0815 Member

    Re: That's it. Ollie has gone too far; Time for Salvo Two.

    Even if he would produce porn (and according to QAnon he is just a broadcaster), he would not film at his home. We also don't have his new home address and would need the address first. Nice plan but lacks basics.
  33. Gold Raider Member

    Re: That's it. Ollie has gone too far; Time for Salvo Two.

    0815, did you saying you are going to bed? Lying again?
  34. iaxiloll Member

    Re: That's it. Ollie has gone too far; Time for Salvo Two.


    I am willing to be namefagged in Germany or the U.K. Witch ever is more suitable for orgasmik win.
  35. 0815 Member

    Re: That's it. Ollie has gone too far; Time for Salvo Two.

    His powers are bad news for you. You would have to fight for your rights in San Francisco Federal Court (according to JewTube) and as soon he has your address, he can hire an attorney in your country and sue for defamation. If you are in the UK, that can be real bad news. At the moment we don't seem to loose any other videos besides the ones against Ollie. He already won this round and it hurts. We have to think before we move and consider if we want to push or let him slide?
  36. 0815 Member

    Re: That's it. Ollie has gone too far; Time for Salvo Two.

    Smurf, FUCK OFF. You have been banned already ones and I'm finishing my reading and go to bad. WTF is your problem? OSA relapse?
  37. Gold Raider Member

    Re: That's it. Ollie has gone too far; Time for Salvo Two.

    0815, for the record, you said you were going to sleep nao, that was 25 min ago. I just follow up to see if you lie. I hope you really are going to bed, nao.
  38. Anonynamefag Member

    Re: That's it. Ollie has gone too far; Time for Salvo Two.

    in b4 drama

    But, I should remind you that even though Hal Turner "won a round", we still pissed him off in the end. Yeah, he made his site a paysite, but that didn't stop the lulz on his radio show.
    My point is that this is a setback, nothing more. By DMCA-ing our videos and pissing in our playground, he basically called us out, and challenged us on our own turf.

    No one has ever beaten Anonymous on the intertubes before. Not Faux News, not Ebaums, not Tom Green, none of the pedos, not even the Gaiafags (okay, they took /b/, but pissing in a lake of piss, etc.). I'll be damned if a Scifag pornographer beats us now, at our own game.
  39. Re: That's it. Ollie has gone too far; Time for Salvo Two.

    But what can we do??
    Yes, we can ruin his life in legal tactics such as showing his neighbors his job and such. but we would need his address and such. and I doubt it would help us much. besides, we might piss him off even more.

    Hey, isn't there some site or something online that allows anyone to find out where anyone lives using only their name and ect.?
  40. Anonynamefag Member

    Re: That's it. Ollie has gone too far; Time for Salvo Two.

    [strike]I think a Whois search can do that, but we'd need his IP address (won't be hard to get off of his websites).
    But a Whois account isn't free.[/strike]

    DISREGARD THAT, I SUCK COCKS.
    The old dox says he was arrested for some shit. Can we get info off of his rap sheets?

Share This Page

Customize Theme Colors

Close

Choose a color via Color picker or click the predefined style names!

Primary Color :

Secondary Color :
Predefined Skins