While I support your defense against the intense amount of obnoxiousness often presented by some losers frequenting WWP, it would be helpful on your part to learn fast the culture of Anonymous, which frankly, takes pride in being rude and obnoxious for the sheer purpose of making others upset. You can never tell if they even really believe in their own words or are just acting to get a reaction out of you. Getting into a struggle with Anons who embrace this characteristic is pointless and will only distract them from their own personal misery they know not how to alleviate. Let them do it to Scientologists whom can't help but react.
There are some statements in what you have mentioned, which I do not respect. I belive you do not know about it. If you want to know about them do write under your name to avoid leading some not yet matured be shown the way the were showed.
a·non·y·mous [uh-non-uh-muh s] –adjective 1.without any name acknowledged, as that of author,contributor, or the like: an anonymous letter to the editor; an anonymous donation.2.of unknown name; whose name is withheld: an anonymous author.3.lacking individuality, unique character, or distinction: an endless row of drab, anonymous houses.
Did a troll trolling troll start a troll thread to troll trolls that troll trolling trolls only to end up causing the trolling toll trolls to troll each other and themselves by misunderstanding each other's trolling of trolling trolls?
They appear to be larger than cranberries. The one on top, which is in the most pristine condition, appears to have been pitted. I'm thinking it's a cherry too.
I think you were previously received comments for that. NO. Efforts dealing with mischievous could not be understood and handled by few anonymous and mouses adding contribution to the mischievous in favour of clearly not hard to realize.
Lost in translation. If English is not your fist tongue, no problem. However, you are incomprehensible.
Yep. Those are Iranian sour cherries. OMNOMNOM Recipe from My Persian Kitchen with moar delicious pix.
Again another attempt at a cutdown and label. If you dont want backlash then dont start a thread like this. Should I start a thread "Why do you hate Isreal" site examples of bombings and direct it at you?
I get that you're probably dealing with a language barrier, so I'll be specific. The group of people who started this website are Anons. One of the key aspects of Anonymous philosophy is anonymous posting. When you don't attach your name to a statement, the statement can be judged on its own merits, not based on your name, whether you're popular, if you're a girl, etc. It can only be judged on how good the idea itself is. Therefore the idea of demanding people not post Anonymously is directly counter to the basic principles of this site and the other sites Anonymous exists on. But I'm pretty sure you're just deadset on being a newfag, not on actually cooperating with the rest of us, so I think you'll probably ignore this. So I'm gonna go ahead and presume anything you post is just more worthless shit. Pity you don't post Anonymously, huh?
What the fuck does that have to do with anything? I used to dislike you because I didn't understand what the hell you were saying because of the whole "how do I spoke english" thing and I didn't like having to guess at what you meant. Now you're just being a newfag. GTFO.
Actually, the information ministry in Iran has started a campaign which has alraedy been mentioned in this forum. Their activity started a few days ago on this forum. You can see some other threads with more obvious intensions. so if I would bet on this, I would put my dime on agents of information ministry.
This is just entertaining but not worth the the resources. Back to reality, the regime of terror has had a very strong intrest in national religious feelings to have let them untill recently be the leading factor of journalisem in Iran. It is in fact deeply rooted in Iran and enormous resources are continiously reserved to deepen the root. Just welcom to reality and see how violence is educated. and they are promoting it to be the same in Iraq. I hope you will not forget the fact that most of these people you see in these video clips are those who suppress on demand and are accessing the rooted corruption favored by the enormous resources. Feel free in case of any question. And here is the latest directive on how it should be, from the terror himself of course. In persian
"Why do we hate Iran?" "We" do? Fascinating. And how do you come to this conclusion, in a Forum dedicated, if all is said and done, to helping Iranians?
For the regime of terror in Iran it is already clear what they will face soon. You can see the sign of disappointment and demoralization in the last speaches of Khameni when he is trying to resist by encoraging his followers to step with hope. Now as for you question and the inension of the thread with this title, I will have to say that Political ethics demand political calls and as morally it is wrong to call any of the personalities responsible for a regime of terror with political respect acording to political ethics, it then leaves the only alternative to be called as "Iran" in this case to have meant "responsible of the regime". So the main purpose of this thread in a forum dedicated to Iranian protesters against tyrani, is to ignite those being supressed against the dedicated in favour of tyrani and a try to stop the moral prespective of the Political ethics.
Do you really think so? Then you must get to know those, beliveing the same, yet with the same passion say you are wrong. I do not know where you are from but I am sure you will find some near you where ever you are, who can by experience show you the power of that passion which casue you wanting to change something in your statment with your face always red.
ill literacy is your problem. No language or abuse is to favor you as a writen remedy, if writen, you never know perhapaps I do swear.
