Wikileaks: These "fair game" labels don't stick on well. I was looking at reports on CNN that Wikileaks is now being labeled this, that and the other in order to try to destroy its credibility and its very existence. These labels do not stick on well, though, as smoke screens and slick propaganda are a very poor adhesive. Even this thing about it now being labeled a "terrorist group", is a poor tactic. Back in 2001, after 9/11 I took a deep and direct look at what would be the main traits of a terrorist group, and came up with 75 major points by which they can be recognized. I used media, Google, and direct experience with Scientology's own terrorism tactics to establish the LIST. The LIST got webbed here: Michael Pattinson: "Terrorism: The 21st Century Battlefield" and in addition to showing what would REALLY be a terrorist group, it also provides a good basis for demonstrating the falsity of a "terrorist" label being affixed to the wrong type of target, and would actually help to show their innocence of such charges in the media or Justice system. How do YOU think Wikileaks stacks up against list? I will refrain from a broad opinion, as I originated this list. i would like to see the opinions of others, however. Desperate tyrants get their PR lackeys to shout loud and often against the actions of perceived enemies. Most often they have bigger things to hide than their "enemy targets". Truth, transparency and integrity are valuable in any culture. Lies and cover-ups are a form of oppression in themselves.